目的 探讨疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的效果.方法 对收治的105例原发性腹股沟疝病例分为对照组50例,予以传统疝修补术治疗,观察组55例,予以疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗,比较两组治疗后的临床效果.结果 在住院时间和住院费用上两组无明显差异性(P＞0.05)；但手术时间、下床时间、恢复工作时间、止痛药使用次数、体温变化情况,两组比较差异明显(P＜0.05),有统计学意义.在切口感染、切口疼痛、阴囊水肿、腹部切口愈合不良、异物感、缺血性睾丸炎等并发症比较,两组比较差异明显(P＜0.05).结论 疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝临床效果显著,且具有安全性高,痛苦小,术后并发症少的优点.%Objective To investigate the effect for hernia ring filling tension-free hernia repair in the application of primary inguinal hernia.Methods 105 patients with primary inguinal hernia cases treated in our hospital from October 2006 to November 2012 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups,the control group received traditional hernia repair treatment,and the observation group was taken with hernia ring filled tension-free hernia repair treatment.The clinical effects in the two groups after treatment were compared.Results There was no significant differences in length of stay and hospital costs for the two groups (P＞0.05),and it was not comparable.From the operation time,bed time,return to work time,look at the number of painkillers,body temperature changes,the two groups were with difference,P＜0.05,and there was statistically significance.In the comparison of wound infection,incisional pain,scrotal edema,abdominal wound healing,foreign body sensation,compare ischemic orchitis complications,the two groups were also with significant differences (P＜0.05),there were statistically significance.Conclusion The clinical effect for hernia ring filling tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia is significant,it is with high safety,less pain and fewer complications.
展开▼
