[目的]探讨张山雷《难经汇注笺正》一书对三焦概念的认识观点.[方法]通过分析比较的研究方法对张氏三焦概念的阐释进行分析.[结果]张氏对难经三焦概念阐释观点鲜明.其遵循王叔和“三焦分隶三部”说,并从部位分段、部位功能、阳气角度去阐释上焦、中焦、下焦三个断面的部位概念；张氏对《难经》错简之处进行大胆修正.[结论]张氏解释难经三焦为:1、部位概念；2、否认唐容川三焦油膜说；3、释三十一难“其府在气街”为疑错简或衍；4、以西医解剖生理学角度纠正徐灵胎释三十一难“下焦”之错注；5、释三焦为六腑之一概念；6、认为三十八难三焦“有元气之别焉,主持诸气”之说是“空虚着墨,莫可证实,终是无可奈何之措辞”之论.%[Objective] To explore the recognition to tri-jiao concept in the book "Correction Note to Nanjing written by Mr. Zhang Shanlei. [Method] Through the analysis and comparison of research methods for the interpretation of Zhang's concept analysis. [Result]It reveals Zhang's difficult interpretation of bright viewpoint. [Conclusion] Zhang explains difficult triple energizers as: 1, site concept. The upper, middle, lower Jiao- three sections of the site concept; 2, deny the Tang Rongchuan oil film; 3, release thirty-one difficult "the palace at gas street" for suspected wrong rhythm or derivatives; 4; from WM anatomy and physiology angle, correct Xu Ling fetal release thirty-one to "coke"+wrong note; 5, release 'three coke' as one concept of organ; 6, that to the thirty-eight "the difference from the energy, presided over the gas" that is "empty ink, without being confirmed, the wording of always feeling helpless " -theory point of view.
展开▼
