《古本难经阐注》之“古本”系宋元时期吴澄校定本考

摘要

Objective] To investigate the book written by Ding Jin, is it really ancient copies of ? [Methods] Relative to,the sequence of the articles in has been adjusted following some regularity. Find the regularity and comparison with other historical literature recordation.[Resuts]is based onrevised by Wu Cheng in Song and Yuan dynasties, removing preface and title, and turning six chapters to four chapters.[Conclusion] Absolutely, < Nan Jing > revised by Wu Cheng has an important value as a new edition and a research reference of ,we should sort it out from ,and make an in-depth study.%[目的]考察清代丁锦《古本难经阐注》一书中所称“古本”的真实性。[方法]寻找《古本难经阐注》与《难经阐注》经文顺序所蕴含的规律，与传世文献中相关记载进行对比研究，确定《古本难经阐注》所称“古本”的真实性。[结果]《古本难经阐注》所称“古本”，实为宋元时期经学大家吴澄所校定本《难经》，丁锦在吴澄的基础上删去序文及篇名，并篡改吴氏所分六篇为四卷，才形成了《古本难经阐注》一书。[结论]吴澄作为经学大家，以经学之力校定《难经》，其校定文字等内容不仅资为《难经》校勘的参考，更是作为《难经》的古传本，为《难经》研究提供了版本依据，故其价值不仅高于明清注本之上，更可直追吕广、杨玄操二氏，对《难经》的辑复、校勘等工作都将具有十分重要的意义。