加功行为的匡正与型构

摘要

In classical theory , the complicity theory which includes the theory of accomplice needs the con-spiracy , it is based on the superstition to will factor .With the weakening of will factor in criminal theory , conspiracy is not the necessary element of participation .The concept of one -side accomplice starts and de-velops with the consideration of making up the loophole of punishment .However , with the enrich of the the-ory of complicity and the theory of principle , the center of the theory of one -side accomplice is getting emp-ty .The agreement or denial of the theory of one -side accomplice without the consideration of criminal poli-cy is meaningless .The typification of participation is important with the rise of strafbarkeit , and the subject element is set with “conspiracy”, “awareness” and “knowing naturally” to confirm the range of punish-ment.%传统理论中，作为帮助犯上位概念的共同犯罪理论要求“通谋”，这是对主观要素中意志因素的迷信，随着刑法理论意志因素的削弱，“通谋”的要件已经不必作为加功行为的必要条件。片面共犯理论的诞生与发展是出于填补法律漏洞的考虑，但随着间接正犯理论与共犯理论的详实，片面共犯的理论内核已经遭到架空，脱离刑事政策单纯证立或证否片面共犯均没有意义。对加功行为应当采取类型化的处理范式，根据处罚必要性的递增分别将加功者的主观要求定位为“通谋”“明知”和“应当知道”，根据个案的不同确定归责范围。