论边缘族群的国家认同模式--兼议容美土司国家认同的历程

摘要

基于“五服”的族群观，古代中国自战国起便延续着“边缘——中心”的族群结构，边缘族群对中心的认同也表现出离散错位式、矛盾式、依附式、抵制式和主体式五种认同模式。从历史看，容美土司国家认同显然沿着一条较理想的路径前进。在这一路径中，“边缘——中心”的误解不断化解，边缘族群的国家认同不断加深，内涵不断丰富，进而促进了一个向心的边缘的形成与稳定。%There had been a periphery-center ethnic structure since the Warring States Period in ancient China, which resulted from a view that saw ethnic groups as scattering in five servant areas (wufu). Peripheral ethnic groups identified with center in five forms: disperse, contrary, dependant, resistive, and subjective. Historically,state identification in Rongmei native hereditary officials followed a fairly ideal course in which misunderstanding of center-periphery was constantly resolved, state identification in peripheral ethnic groups became strong and its connotation became rich, and the periphery was established as a stable center oriented one.