医学期刊高下载频次论文特征分析--以《重庆医学》为例

摘要

目的：对《重庆医学》150篇高下载频次论文的基本信息进行分析，为探讨本刊论文发表的规律提供依据。方法将知网《重庆医学》下载频次排名前150篇论文纳入本次研究，分析论文的总下载频次、单篇论文下载频次、总被引频次、单篇论文被引频次、作者、单位、基金资助论文、刊载栏目等。结果（1）146篇高下载频次论文，下载频次平均是被引频次的48.22倍（2035/71103）；高下载频次论文的下载频次与被引频次呈低度正相关关系（r=0.250，P=0.002）；（2）高下载频次论文，发表栏目排名前3的依次为：综述（54.1%）、论著（21.9%）、医院或卫生管理（7.5%）；（3）第一作者主要来自重庆医科大学及其附属医院、第三军医大学及其附属医院，其他单位占28.8%；（4）有本刊编委或审稿专家署名的文章有61篇，占41.78%；（5）基金资助论文有31篇，占21.23%；（6）平均发表年限时间为6.35±2.36年，主要集中在发表后4~8年。结论本刊高下载频次论文的下载频次与被引频次存在一定的相关关系；实际刊载量较小的栏目，但其被引频次不一定高；要充分发挥本土医疗资源和编委的影响力，扩大基金论文发表比例。%objective To analyze the characteristics of high download frequency paper of Chongqing Medical Journal. Methods The top 150 high download frequency papers published in Chongqing Medical Journal were collected from CNKI database to analyze the total download frequency, download frequency of single papers, citation frequency, single paper citation frequency, authorship, affiliations, funding, and published columns. Results For the 146 high download frequency papers, the download frequency averaged 2035 times with a citation frequency of 71 103 times, showing a low correlation between download frequency and citation frequency (r=0.250, P=0.250). In the high download frequency papers, the top 3 were published in columns of review (54.1%), original articles (21.9%), and hospital or health management (7.5%). The first authors came mainly from Chongqing Medical University and the affiliated hospitals and Third Military Medical University and its affiliated hospitals. Sixty-one papers(41.78%) had signature of our editors or reviewing experts, 31 (21.23%) had funding support. The average time length from publish to download was (6.35 ± 2.36) years (range 4-8 years). Conclusion There is a correlation between the download frequency and citation frequency among the high download frequency papers of Chongqing Medical Journal; the actual published small columns, but cited frequency is not high necessarily; local medical research resources are still the main source of publication quality manuscripts. The probability of paper with fund support is higher than paper without fund support.