张烈尊朱斥王及其在清初学术重建中的境遇

摘要

As to the debate on whether to establish history,Zhang Lie wrote Wangxue Zhiyi,identifying Confucianism Biography in the compiling of Ming Dynasty similarities and differences between Zhu and Lu,and accordingly he became the vanguard of Neo-Confucianism. After Zhang Lie died,Lu Longqi and Zhang Boxing published his book and promoted his academics. the schools of Wang, Yan and Li. That Zhang At the same time, their radical approaches incurred criticism from Lie respected Neo-Confucianism reflected the political needs of ideological reconstruction, but with the transfer of academic atmosphere and the rise of textual criticism, getting rid of Neo-Confucianism was inevitable, and the debate between Zhu and Lu became outdated.%鉴于清初《明史》纂修是否设立《道学传》的争论，张烈撰《王学质疑》，严辨朱陆异同，成为清初尊朱斥王的急先锋。张烈卒后，陆陇其、张伯行张扬其学，先后刊刻《王学质疑》，广为传播；其过激的做法也招致了来自王学和颜李学派的批评。张烈尊朱的态度反映了清初理学重建的政治需要，但随着学术风气的转移，摆脱理学已成必然之势，尤其在考据学兴起后，朱陆之争已是明日黄花。