刍议现存敦煌唐代景教文献的真伪问题

摘要

This paper discusses the authenticity of existing Dunhuang manuscripts on Nestorianism in Tang Dynasty. There is no doubt about the authenticity of “San Wei Meng Du Zan” and “Zun Jing”, which included in Dunhuang manuscript P.3847.And the reliability of Zhi Xuan An Le J ing and Xuan Yuan Ben J ing is quite high.While Da Sheng Tong Zhen Gui Fa Zan and Xuan Yuan Ben J ing can be judged as pseudographs.Though some scholars doubt about the authenticity ofYi Shen Lun and Xu Ting Mi Shi J ing , this paper argues that the evidence is not enough to judge them as pseudographs.%随着2006年洛阳唐代景教经幢与幢文«大秦景教宣元至本经»的问世，以及李盛铎旧藏敦煌文书整体在日本以«敦煌秘笈»的形式影印刊布，原本扑朔迷离的唐代景教敦煌文献大体已经可以梳理清楚.敦煌卷子伯希和P．3847包括的«三威蒙度赞»«尊经»为唐代敦煌文献本无疑异；李盛铎旧藏敦煌写本中«志玄安乐经»«宣元本经»等敦煌景教文献的可信程度非常高；而«大圣通真归法赞»«宣元至本经»，绝非李氏藏品，内容也与洛阳景教经幢幢文不符，应该可以判定为伪书.«一神论»与«序听迷诗所经»近年来始有学者怀疑其真实性，但所提两类证据都不足以肯定其为伪作.