The author reviewed and commented several currently popular viewpoints of researches on sports essence, and put forward the following opinions: for a long time, the sports theory circle’s study of sports essence fell into the threshold of sports language, grammar and pragmatics, which was shown in that the “genus plus specific difference” method habitu-ally used to show sports essence belongs to a logic critical thinking system; “genus plus specific difference” is based on a perfect logic form, not provided with the efficacy to completely show sports essence, although it has the function to verify whether sports essence conforms to logic; moreover, concept description is established based on the subject’s subjective experience; although concept description is effective, it is not comprehensive – cannot completely describe body experi-ence as a sport, therefore it cannot completely express sports essence. Hence, the author put forward that researchers should realize the body turning of researches on sports essence based on phenomenological methods, return to the primi-tive experience of the body, suspend objective thinking, associate sports meaning with body generation, and search the meaning of sports essence from the self presentation, self construction and self expression of the body.%回顾与评价了当前几种主流的体育本质研究观点，认为长期以来，体育理论界对于体育本质的研究陷于体育语言、语法、语用的阈限之中，表现为惯用呈现体育本质的“属加种差”方法从属于逻辑的批判思维体系，“属加种差”基于完美的逻辑形式，虽具有检验体育本质是否合乎逻辑的功能，但本身却不具备完整呈现体育本质的效力；并且，概念述说基于主体的主观经验之上；概念述说虽然有效但不全面——并不能完整表述作为体育的身体经验，也就不能完整表达体育的本质。由此提出应基于现象学的方法，实现体育本质研究的转向，回归到身体的原始经验中，悬置对象性思维，将体育的意义与身体的生成相联系，从身体的自我展示、自我建构、自我表达中探寻体育的本质含义。
展开▼
