我国护理期刊有关随机对照试验系统评价的论文书写质量评价

摘要

目的 评价近年来发表在我国护理专业期刊上有关随机对照试验系统评价的论文书写质量.方法 检索中国期刊全文数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库和万方医药期刊数据库,并辅以手工检索,筛选出2006-2010年在护理专业期刊上发表的关于随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT)的系统评价报告,运用Meta分析的统一报告格式,也称评价指南,即QUOROM(Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses)声明对文献的书写质量予以评价.结果 经过筛选,共纳入符合标准的文献32篇,其中以Meta分析命名的22篇,以系统评价命名的8篇,以其他命名的2篇.分布在<中华护理杂志><护理研究><解放军护理杂志><护士进修杂志><护理学报>等11种护理专业期刊上.32篇关于随机对照试验的系统评价中,仅有极少文章全部符合QUOROM声明提出的撰写要求,存在的主要问题是题目不规范、%Objective To evaluate the writing quality of papers on systematic reviews on randomized controlled trials published on domestic nursing journals in recent years. Methods Retrievals were conducted of all the nursing literature systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials from 2006 to 2010 in CNKI, VIP Database and Wanfang Data, then the quality of these literatures were evaluated with the tool of QUOROM. Results After screening, a total of 32 nursing literature systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials were retrieved, 22 of which were named Meta-analysis and 8 systematic evaluation. They were published in 11 nursing journals such as Chinese Journal of Nursing Chinese Nursing Research, Nursing Journal of Chinese People 's Liberation Army, Journal of Nursing (China) and so on. Few of these literatures met the writing requirements of QUOROM. The main problems were non-standard titles, abstracts with incomprehensive content, inadequate preface, incomplete data source, improper data analysis and lack of flow chart. Conclusion The number and quality of reports that published on domestic nursing journals have been increasing and improving in recent years, but there still exist some problems about standard writing. Norms to improve the quality of reports of systematic review should be established.