文章从悲剧这个剧种的本质特征及其相关的贵族文化意识出发，对《哈姆雷特》中主人公复仇行动的延宕问题作了新的解读，认为哈姆雷特内心深处有着极其浓厚的贵族文化意识，他试图为自己的复仇行动找到一个与其王子身份和贵族意识相称的公开的、仪式化的机会，但始终未能找到。这也是他一直犹豫不决，举棋不定，最终造成玉石俱焚的悲剧结局根本原因。但是，从诗性正义的角度看，哈氏最终还是完成了他为自己设定的复仇大业，既兑现了自己的承诺、完成了父王的遗愿，也在一定程度上恢复和重建了被他的叔父颠倒了的伦理秩序和社会规范。%Based on the essential characteristics of the tragedy as a genre of drama relating with the consciousness of aristocratic culture, this paper attempts to give a new interpretation of Hamlet’s revenge delay. As a prince, Hamlet has a very strong aristocratic cultural consciousness in his inner mind. He tries to find a public, ritualized opportunity for his revenge carrying out being worthy of his status and identity, but never got it. This is why he has been so hesitant and indecisive that eventually leads a sad ending of destruction of good and bad alike. From the perspective of poetic justice, however, Hamlet has finally completed his undertaking of revenge, which not only fulfills his promise of finishing his father's last wishes, but also, to a certain extent, regains and reconstructs the ethical order and social norm being overturned by his uncle the usurper.
展开▼
