在当代西方科学哲学对真理问题的探索中,传统的基础主义的线式决定符合真理论受到质疑与颠覆,后现代的非线性建构主义真理观走向前台。美国当代科学哲学家范.弗拉森作为后现代建构主义真理观的翘楚从后现代建构主义立场出发,吸收20世纪以来统计物理学、相对论、概率论、语义学和语用学研究的最新成果,批判了基础主义实在论的线性符合真理观,提出了非线性的语义和语用概率真理论以及语境具体真理观。为了更好地坚持和发展马克思主义的真理观,使马克思主义真理观建立在当代自然科学最新成果诸如相对论、统计物理学、概率论、信息论的成果之上,我们要批判借鉴后现代主义概率真理论和语用、语境真理论,反对真理观上的线性决定论,正确处理反映与建构、确定与不确定、线性与非线性的辩证关系,丰富马克思主义真理观。%Among different schools probing into truth theory in contemporary western scientific philosophy, the linearity of tradi- tional fundamentalism determines that consistency truth theory must be questioned and challenged, and post - modem non - linear constructionist truth theory would come onto the scene. Contemporary American science philosopher Van Fraason is an outstanding scholar initiating post - modern constructivist truth theory. Starting from post - modem constructivism, he puts forward non - linear semantic and pragmatic probability truth theory and context - specific truth theory, based on his absorption of the latest achievements in statistical physics, relativity, probability, semantics and pragmatics, as well as his criticism to the linear consistency truth theory in fundamentalist realism. In order to better adhere to and develop Marxist truth theory, and to construct Marxist truth theory on the basis of the latest achievements in contemporary natural sciences, including relativity, statistical physics, probability and information theory, we need to criticize and learn from post -modern probability truth theory, and pragmatic and contextualized truth theory, to oppose linear determination in truth theory, to correctly deal with the dialectal relations between reflection and construction, certainty and uncertainty, linearity and non -linearity, and finally, to enrich Marxist truth theory.
展开▼
