调解率的异化与反思——调解案件进入执行程序的分析解读

摘要

The mediation has the functional advantages of maximizing consensus, lowing cost, improving efficiency and conserving ju- dicial resources. Too many mediation cases going into executive procedure reflect the two sides : repentance eft mediation and alienation of mediation effect, which is contrary to the original purpose of mediation and weakens the judicial function, This phenomenon is caused by the parties' malicious delay and the implementation of the judicial policy adopted by court. We should reasonably position the mediation system and clarify the misunderstanding of judicial concept. Mediation has no danger of overturning the rule of law. Therefore, we should not regard mediation as the only judiciary representation. We should make reasonable design of judiciary exami- nation technology rules which correct the judges' trend of neglecting and weakening mediation and pay attention to automatic execution of mediation cases. We should perfect the legal system, attach importance to execution guarantee mechanism of mediation cases amt reinforce punishment for refusal to implement cases.%调解表明双方合意的最大化，具有维权成本低、及时化解矛盾、节约司法资源等功能性优势。过多调解案件进人执行程序反映出调解反悔率高、调解效果异化，与调解制度的初衷相背离，“案结事了”司法功能出现弱化趋势。这种现象既有当事人恶意拖延、逃避执行等因素，也有法院为主导的政策驱动下强制调解的原因。应合理定位调解制度，在司法理念上澄清认识误区。调解既没有颠覆法治规则的危险，也不应将调解率作为和谐司法的唯一表征。在司法考核技术规则上应合理设计，既纠正法官忽视、弱化调解的偏向，又注重调解案件自动履行率。进一步完善司法制度，注重调解案件的执行担保机制，加强对拒不履行的制裁力度。