拉布里奥拉是一个历史决定论者吗

摘要

On the one hand, on the regularity of historical development,the traditional historical determinism says the law of necessity is absolute, while in the lab ora claims the law of historical development in a generation,is the dialectical unification of inevitability and contingency. On the subject of historical development,the traditional historical determinism view is realistic personal history of onlookers,while in the lab ora realized has the subjective initiative of the individual is the historical development of the real main body;On the understanding of the historical process,the traditional historical determinism think description of historical development factors is isolated or monism,ora in lab that history is an organic and unified whole. On the other hand,the historical determinist deny the existence of the historical law,ora in lab seriatim criticism for their reasons. Therefore, ora in the lab of dialectical view of history to the history of the traditional mechanical determinism and anti historical determinism has realized the double.%一方面，关于历史发展的规律性，传统的历史决定论认为规律的必然性是绝对的，而拉布里奥拉则主张历史发展的规律处于生成中，是必然性和偶然性的辩证统一；关于历史发展的主体，传统的历史决定论认为现实的个人只是历史的旁观者，而拉布里奥拉则意识到具有主观能动性的个人是历史发展的真正的主体；在对历史进程的理解上，传统的历史决定论认为描述历史发展的因素是孤立的或一元论的，而拉布里奥拉则主张历史是一个有机的、统一的整体。另一方面，反历史决定论者否定历史规律的存在，拉布里奥拉针对他们的理由进行了逐一地批判。因此，拉布里奥拉的辩证的历史观对传统机械的历史决定论和反历史决定论实现了双重的超越。