首页> 中文期刊>湖北文理学院学报 >论题系沙上建塔,铁证乃谬误堆成——答吴直雄先生并与其《习凿齿及其相关问题再考辨》一文商榷

论题系沙上建塔,铁证乃谬误堆成——答吴直雄先生并与其《习凿齿及其相关问题再考辨》一文商榷

     

摘要

族谱大凡远溯名人为始祖或始迁祖又无确凿旁证支持的基本都属造伪,《白梅习氏族谱》中关于习凿齿的记载也属于此。吴直雄先生以《白梅习氏族谱》、子虚鸟有的《大元大一统志》记载、1500年前袁州《郡志》所载习凿齿隐居江西的资料为依据,考证出习凿齿晚年隐居新余白梅,这一结论是错误的。吴直雄先生将《汉晋春秋》和《襄阳耆旧记》的完成时间、地点、内容及习凿齿的生卒年等全部弄错了。%Pedigree of a clan without surporting evidences, in which a famous person was regarded as the first ancestor, is generally fake. Therefor the records on Xi Zuochi in The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei are unrea- sonable. Based on The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei, unreal Da Yuan Dayitong Zhi, Jun Zhi by Yuan Zhou 1500 years ago, Wu Zhixiong holds that Xi Zuochi lived in seclusion in Baimei, Xinyu in the last days of his life. However this conclusion is wrong. Moreover, the time, the site and the content of Hai Jin Chunqiu and Xiangyang Qijiu Ji are wrong, including Xi Zuochi' s birth time and death time.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号