针刀疗法配合远道取穴针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效观察

摘要

目的评价针刀疗法配合远道取穴针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法将68例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为针刀治疗组（N＝33）与针刺对照组（N＝35）。针刀治疗组给予近取腰骶部局部阳性反应点进行松解切割治疗，远取足太阳膀胱经输穴束骨或足少阳胆经输穴足临泣及血郄委中进行针刀治疗。每周治疗2次，2周为1个疗程；针刺对照组给予常规辨经取穴，选取华佗夹脊、大肠俞、肾俞（双）、殷门、秩边（患侧）及阳陵泉（患侧）等，留针期间配合电针及TDP照射治疗。每周治疗5次，2周为1个疗程。2组均随访1个月。疗程结束后，采取日本骨科学会下腰痛评分（JOA）及疼痛视觉类比评分（VAS）进行疗效评价。结果（1）治疗后，2组JOA评分均较治疗前显著提高， VAS评分均较治疗前显著降低，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05），且针刀治疗组对JOA评分的提高作用及对VAS评分的降低作用更显著，组间比较差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。随访时，2组VAS评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。（2）针刀治疗组总有效率为87．9％，针刺对照组为77．1％；针刀治疗组疗效优于针刺对照组，2组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论针刀疗法配合远道取穴针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症，具有安全高效、远期疗效可靠、复发率低等优点，值得临床推广运用。%Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of acupotomy therapy combined with acupuncture based on distal points selection for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion ( LIDP) . Methods Sixty-eight LIDP patients were randomly divided into treatment group (N=33) and control group(N=35). The treatment group were given acupotomy therapy on the proximal positive response points in the lumbosacral region for relaxing the tendons,and acupuncture therapy based on distal points selection of Shugu, the Shu-stream point of the foot Taiyang bladder meridian, Zulinqi and Weizhong, the shu-stream point and the blood xi-cleft point of the foot Shaoyang gallbladder meridian respectively, twice a week, 2 weeks constituting one course of treatment. The control group was given conventional electroacupuncture therapy on Huatuo clip points, Dachangshu point, bilateral Shenshu points, Yinmen point, bilateral Zibian points and bilateral Yanglingquan points, and together with TDP radiation therapy, 5 times a week, 2 weeks constituting one course of treatment. The two groups received follow-up for one month. The low back pain scores of Japanese orthopaedic society ( JOA) and visual analog scores ( VAS) of pain were used for the evaluation of therapeutic effect after the treatment. Results ( 1) After treatment, the JOA scores were increased and VAS scores were decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment ( P< 0.05) , and the increase of JOA scores and the decrease of VAS in the treatment group were superior to those in the control group ( P< 0.05) . There was statistically significant difference of VAS scores between the two groups ( P < 0.05) during the follow-up period. ( 2) The total effective rate was 87.9%in the treatment group, and was 77.1%in the control group, the difference being significant (P<0.05) . Conclusion The acupotomy therapy combined with acupuncture based on distal points selection is effective and safe for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, which has the advantages of reliable long-term effect and low recurrence rate, showing good prospects for extensive clinical application.