通过对“主权—治权”分析框架及其相关政治论述的检视和反思，发现该分析框架存在诸多问题：治权是一个学术上欠规范的概念，两岸对“治权”的理解不尽相同，该分析框架存在着逻辑上的缺陷，该分析框架对两岸分裂现状的解释欠缺说服力。针对这些问题，笔者提出了替代性分析框架，即“主权所有权—主权行使权—一般治权”分析框架。新分析框架的核心是将国家权力整体划分为三部分，这在逻辑上比“二分法”更加严谨与科学。它有助于更具体地描述和界定目前两岸现状，有助于更有力地维护“一个中国”框架，有助于更好地找到解决两岸统一问题的切入点。%Reflecting on the analytical framework of “sovereignty-jurisdiction” and relevant political discus-sion, we may find that this framework has many problems because jurisdiction is not an academically nor-mative concept.Besides, China’s T aiwan and China’s mainland have different understanding on this con-cept.Furthermore, the analytical framework is illogical and its interpretation about the disunity of China’ s T aiwan and China’s mainland is not convincing.In order to solve these problems, this article puts for-wards an alternative analytical framework of “sovereignty proprietary—executive power of sovereignty—jurisdiction”.T he core of the new analytical framework is that it divides the state power into three parts, which is more precise and scientific than “dichotomy” in terms of logic.M oreover, it can help us describe and define the current cross-strait relations more specifically, safeguard the political framework of “one China” more powerfully and find a breakthrough to the reunification of China’s T aiwan and China’s main-land.
展开▼
