律师在场权本土化的理论反思

摘要

侦查讯问阶段的律师在场权作为扩大被追诉人辩护权和遏制刑讯逼供的制度保障具有积极意义。但是，律师在场权的固有特征和内在原理决定了其要受到一系列要素的制约和限制。首先，在保障供述自愿性的意义上，沉默权是律师在场权的权利基础和逻辑前提，沉默权的缺失势必会影响其效能的发挥。其次，我国刑事审判前程序中裁判权缺失的诉讼格局影响着律师在场权的实施，刑事司法实践中侦查讯问的固有特征和律师的现实地位也阻碍着律师在场权遏制刑讯逼供的效能发挥。再次，巨大的口供依赖和口供补偿机制的匮乏，使律师在场权面临着被规避的风险。%The right of lawyer during interrogation has a positive meaning on expanding the right to defense and restraining the torture.However,the inherent characteristics and principles determine the lawyer presence right is subject to a series of elements.First,the right to be silent is the foundation and logical premise of the lawyer presence right.The absence of the right to silent is bound to affect the play of its effectiveness.Second,the absence of jurisdiction in pretrial proceedings affect the function of the lawyer presence right,the real status of criminal justice practice also impede the lawyer presence right curbing torture.Again,a huge confessions dependence and the lack of confessions compensation mechanism make the lawyer presence right at risk of being circumvented.