目的:调查低年级大学生网络成瘾及成瘾倾向,了解其心理健康状况及所采取的应对方式,为大学生网络成瘾的早期干预提供依据.方法:分层抽取安徽某大学一、二年级大学生190名,使用<网络成瘾诊断量表>、和<特质应对方式问卷>进行自填式问卷调查.结果:调查对象网络成瘾检出率为5.3%,其中男生8.1%,女生3.9%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);二年级为8.9%,高于一年级1.1%(P<0.05);网络成瘾倾向检出率为16.8%,其中男生19.4%,女生15.6%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);二年级为19.8%,高于一年级13.5%(P>0.05).网络成瘾组及倾向组与正常组比较,SCL-90总分及各因子分均高于正常组(P＜0.01);在应对方式上,网络成瘾组与正常组在消极应对上差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01),积极应对上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:低年级大学生网络成瘾及倾向者心理健康水平较低,且倾向于使用消极的应对方式.%Objective: To explore the cunent status of internet addiction and addiction tendencies of junior college students, and to study the status of the irmental health and the coping styles, so as to provide the basis for the early intervention for junior college students. Methods: Using stratified cluster random sanpling method, 190 college students of Anhui Province were investigated with " CIAS-R"," Symptom Check Scale List-90" and" Trait Coping Style Questionnaire". Results: Among all students surveyed 5. 3% of intemet users were diagnosed with internet addiction, including 8. 1% male students and 3. 9% female students. There was no significant difference between them(P >0. 05). It was higher in sophcmores(8. 9% ) than in freshmen(1. 1% ) (P <0. 05). The prevalence rate of internet addiction tendencies was16. 8% , including19.4% male students and15. 6% female students. There was no significant difference between them( P > 0. 05). There was 19. 8% of sophcmores, compared with 13. 5% of freshnen with no significance between them( P > 0. 05). Intemet addiction group and addiction tendency group, compared with normal group had significant differences in the total scores of all factors of SCL-90(P <0.01). There were significant differences in the negative coping style between internet addiction group and normal group(P <0. 01). Positive coping style of the se groups had no statistical difference (P >0.05). Conclusions: internet addiction and addiction tendencies anong junior college students have lowermental healti and tend to use the negative style.
展开▼
