[目的]对长株潭生态文明建设水平进行综合评价.[方法]运用层次分析法,通过构建长株潭生态文明评价体系,对长株潭生态文明建设水平进行综合评价,分析生态文明建设中存在的问题与原因,并提出相应的建议与对策.[结果]在自然子系统和社会子系统 方面,长株潭城市群综合得分别为0.143和0.214,长沙的综合得分最高(0.150和0.221),其次为湘潭(0.142和0.219),株洲得分最低(0.136和0.213).在经济子系统方面,长株潭城市群得综合得分为0.216,长沙综合得分最高(0.247),其次为株洲(0.201),而湘潭得分最低(0.197).在文化子系统方面,长株潭城市群的综合得分为0.078,在4个子系统中得分最低,这与权重较低有关；长沙与湘潭的得分最高,均为0.079,而株洲稍稍落后(0.077).[结论]长株潭城市群的生态文明建设处于较好的水平,总体发展势态良好.%[Objective] The aim was to assess the ecological civilization construction in Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan synthetically. [ Method] By means of analytic hierarchy process, the assessment system of ecological civilization in Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan was established firstly, and then the ecological civilization construction in Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan was evaluated comprehensively, and the existing problems and causes of ecological civilization construction were analyzed, finally the corresponding suggestions and countermeasures were put forward. [Result] For natural subsystem and social subsystem, the comprehensive scores of Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan were 0. 143 and 0.214, and Changsha had the highest scores (0. 150 and 0. 221) , and next came Xiangtan (0. 142 and 0.219) , while the scores were the lowest in Zhuzhou (0.136 and 0.213). From economic subsystem, the comprehensive score of Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan was 0.216, and the maximum score also appeared in Changsha (0.247) , Zhuzhou the second (0.201) , while Xiangtan owned the lowest score (0. 197 ). In cultural subsystem, the comprehensive score of Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan was only 0.078 which was the lowest score a-mong the four subsystems, and it was related to its low weight. In addition, the scores of Changsha and Xiangtan took the first place (0.079) , while it was lower in Zhuzhou (0.077 ). [ Conclusion ] The ecological civilization construction in Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan persisted at a higher level and developed well.
展开▼
