目的:对比分析ST段抬高心肌梗死与非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者低密度脂蛋白及心肌损伤标志物的差异.方法:将2018年6月～2018年12月住院治疗的急性心肌梗死患者作为研究对象, 将其中ST段抬高的心肌梗死患者作为ST段抬高组 (30例), 非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者作为非ST段抬高组 (30例), 检查两组患者入院24 h内的心肌损伤标志物:CTNI、MB、CK, CK-MB以及LDL情况.结果:两组患者CTNI、MB、CK, CK-MB以及LDL指标比较, 差异均有统计学意义 (P<0.05) .结论:ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者低密度脂蛋白及心肌损伤标志物存在一定差异, 对于临床早期诊断具有一定意义.%Objective To compare and analyze the differences of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and myocardial injury markers between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarct. Method The patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to December 2018 were selected as the study subjects. Among them, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was treated as ST-segment elevation group (30 patients), while non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was treated as non-ST-segment elevation group (30 patients). The myocardial damage markers of CTNI, MB, CK, CK-MB were examined within 24 hours of admission in two groups. Results There were significant differences in CTNI, MB, CK, CK-MB and LDL between the two groups (P<0. 05). Conclusion There are some differences between ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in low density lipoprotein and myocardial injury markers, which have certain significance for early clinical diagnosis.
展开▼
