"产品是否落入专利权保护范围"历来被专利司法实践者作为判定是否侵犯专利权的隐形范式.但这里蕴含了一个前提条件,那就是产品中固化了唯一的技术方案.然而,随着技术的发展,那些需要根据使用场景进行配置之后才能使用的产品也开始大行其市,这些产品中不会固化任何技术方案,会随着使用前的配置不同而呈现不同的技术方案.原来判定侵权的范式能否直接适用于这一新型事实,便很成问题.因此,本文即以《专利法》第11条与第59条关系为视角去构建一个能够解决这一新型问题的范式适用前提.%Whether a product falls within the scope of patent protection is accepted by judicial practitioners as an implied paradigm to determine whether the product constitutes infringement. It contains a prerequisite, that is, there is only one technical scheme embedded in the accused infringed product. However, with the technological development, the products which are configured and used according to different operation environment are becoming popular in the market. There is not any fixed specific technical scheme in these products, and to the contrary, various technical schemes are displayed in line with different configurations beforehand. It is therefore worth asking whether the traditional infringement judgment paradigm can be directly applied to this new fact. The paper, taking the relationship between article 11 and article 59 of the Patent Law as a perspective, tries to construct a prerequisite of paradigm applicable to the new type of problems.
展开▼
