不同手术方案治疗股骨粗隆间骨折老年患者的效果对比

摘要

fracture healing time , postoperative complications , and postoperative hip function .Result:The surgery time , load time, length of hospital stay and complications of patients in the DHS group were significantly extended than those of the PFNA and PFLCP group , and the bleeding was more , the incidence of complications com-paring with the other two groups was significantly increased (P <0.05), and the follow-up Harris scoring of the PFNA group after 1 month was obviously higher than that of the DHS group and the PFLCP group ( P <0.05) , and the Harris scoring of patients in three groups after surgery 3 months,6 months and 12 months were no obvious difference (P >0.05).Conclusion:PFNA and PFLCP comparing with DHS have the ad -vantages of short recovery time and fewer complications , but PFNA has significant advantage of postoperative functional recovery in the short term , so we think that PENA should be as the preferred surgical procedure for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures .%对动力髋螺钉（ DHS）、股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（ PFNA）以及股骨近端锁定加压接骨板（ PFLCP ）对股骨粗隆间骨折老年患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。方法：对我院2011年2月至2013年12月收治并分别经动力髋螺钉（ DHS ）、股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（ P FNA ）以及股骨近端锁定加压接骨板（ PFLCP ）手术治疗的60例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者进行回顾性分析，其中DHS组25例，PFNA组18例，PFLCP 组17例，三组分别从手术一般情况、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症以及术后髋关节功能情况进行比较分析。结果：DHS组患者在手术时间、负重时间、住院时间以及并发症发生方面均较PFNA组和PFLCP 组明显延长，且出血量较多，并发症发生率也较其余两组明显增加（ P＜0．05），而术后1个月随访PFNA组患者的 Harris评分明显高于DHS组和PFLCP 组（P＜0．05），而术后3个月、6个月、12个月三组患者均无明显差异（ P＞0．05）。结论：PFNA和PFLCP 相比DHS均具有恢复时间短、并发症少的优势，但PFNA术后患者在短期髋关节功能恢复方面具有显著优势，PFNA可作为治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的首选手术方式。