运动行为调节问卷在中国大学生运动员中的检验

摘要

目的:对中文版《运动行为调节问卷》(BRSQ-6)在中国大学生运动员人群的应用进行信效度检验.方法:研究者采用翻译—回译的方法将BRSQ-6翻译成中文,并在334名中国大学生运动员人群中进行施测.采用验证性因子分析(CFA)及探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)对BRSQ六个测量模型进行了检验和比较,对BRSQ-6的结构效度进行检验.同时,对内部一致性信度及理论效度进行检验.结果:与已有研究相一致,BRSQ-6六因子模型(模型1)相对拟合更好.已有研究表明CFA在多因子模型估计中体现的不足,可以通过ESEM得以解决.研究发现,ESEM结果优于CFA结果,并且更加合理.另外,研究结果表明各分量表的内部一致性信度及问卷的理论效度均达到预期可接受水平.结论:整体而言,中文版BRSQ-6的信效度指标达到可接受水平,但个别条目的跨因子现象存在异常,仍需进一步修订及检验.%Objective To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire (BRSQ) among a sample of Chinese collegiate athletes.Methods The BRSQ was translated from English into Chinese using the translation and back translation approach.A sample of 334 Chinese collegiate athletes was invited to complete the questionnaire.Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)and exploratory structure equation model(ESEM)approaches were used to examine the factor structure of the BRSQ.Moreover,the internal consistency reliability and nomological validity were examined.Results CFA results suggested that the 6-factor model(BRSQ-6)outperformed other measurement models.However,given the limitations of CFA approach in examining the factor structure of multidimensional instrument,ESEM was also used in this study because it could better present the underlying factor structure of the multidimensional scale.It was found that,as expected,the ESEM solution was better than CFA solution in representing the BRSQ-6 measurement model.The normological validity and internal consistency reliability of all BRSQ-6 subscales were also found acceptable.Conclusion In general,the BRSQ-6 Chinese version demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability among Chinese collegiate athletes.It is noteworthy that unexpected cross-loading of some items have been identified,which implys that researchers should use the instrument with cautions.Future studies should be conducted to revise the problematic items.