神经眼科国内外文献分析

摘要

Purpose To analyze the contents of domestic and international publications in neuroophthalmology during the past decade. Methods CBM and Medline were separately searched in 2007,by using Medical subject heading for retrieving Chinese and English-language neuro-ophthalmic articles which were published between 1997 and 2006. Results A total of 13052 English-written articles available for analysis were contributed from more than 70 countries,mainly from USA,United Kingdom,Japan,Germany,Italy and Canada.The order of frequency was visual cortex(4496/13052,34.4%),optic nerve diseases(3870/13052,29.7%),ocular motility disorders(2899/13052,22.2%),visual pathway(1191/13052,9.1%)pupil disorders(596/13052,5.6%).While a total of 3726 articles were retrieved from CBM,the order of frequency being optic nerve diseases(1854,49.8%),ocular motility disorders(excluding strabismus,1357,36.4%),pupil disorders(242,6.5%),visual cortex(202,5.4%),visual pathway (excluding retina,optic nerve,visual cortex,71).Researchers with diverse specialties contributed to the neuro-ophthalmic publications.Compared with international counterpart,domestic articles related tO basic researches were much less. Conclusion Neuro-ophthalmoloy is interdisciplinarv with a wide range of researches and various study hotspots.Domestic basic researches on neuro-ophthalmology remain to be strengthened and improved.%目的 分析近十年国内外期刊发表的神经眼科相关文献,就其内容进行比较,了解国内外神经眼科发展的特点和差距.方法 国内文献通过中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、国外文献通过Pubmed提供的Medline数据库,采用医学主题词(Mesh)检索的方法检索1997年至2006年国内发表的中文神经眼科文献和国际上发表的英文神经眼科文献.结果 1997年至2006年Pubmed可检索到英文神经眼科相关文献13 052篇,文章主要来自美国、英联邦国家、日本、德国,意大利和加拿大等70多个国家,发表数量及所占比例依次为视皮质(4496/13 052,34.4%),视神经疾病(3 870/13 052,29.7%),眼球运动障碍(28 99/13 052,22.2%),视路(1 191/13 052,9.1%)及瞳孔障碍(596/13 052,4.6%).同时间段CBM可检索到中文神经眼科相关文献3726篇,其中视神经疾病1854篇,占49.8%,瞳孔疾病242篇,占6.5%,眼球运动障碍(斜视除外)1357篇,占36.4%,视皮质202篇(占5.4%),视路(不包括视网膜、视神经、视皮质)71篇.无论是国内还是国际,发表的文献均涉及到神经眼科各分支领域的临床和基础研究等各方面,涉及的专业领域广泛,除了眼科外,神经内、外科或神经科学、耳鼻喉科等也占了较大部分.与国外相比,国内基础研究方面的文献较少.结论 神经眼科是一门多专业交叉边缘学科,其研究方向广泛,研究热点多样化.目前国内神经眼科已经起步,但基础研究较薄弱,有待加强.