目的：从《护理美学》课程对护生人文素养培养角度出发，探索一个被师生共同认可的多样化考核方法。方法选择上海中医药大学护理学院2012及2013级护理本科学生，根据其特点及课程大纲安排设计考核方案，采用小组作业、形体训练和综合场景训练等多方面综合考核方法，课程结束后对学生进行问卷调查。结果在考核方案的认可情况上，最受欢迎的是情景演示，占44．3％；其次是护理礼仪考核和病房设计作业考核，分别占26．7％和23．3％；论文写作最不受欢迎，占5．7％。认为考核内容能全面或尚可反映教学效果的占93．9％，认为考核方式能体现教学效果的占84．2％，认为各部分考核方式合适或一般的占92．2％。在课程内容上，男女生对理论讲授和情境展示的喜欢程度比较，差异无统计学意义（χ2值分别为0．027，1．079；P＞0．05）；对于礼仪训练、化妆课等的喜好方面，男女生比较，差异有统计学意义（χ2值为6．339～57．295；P＜0．05）。结论多样化的考核方式更能体现《护理美学》对护生人文素养培养的效果。%Objective To study and explore the evaluation of the humanities oriented nursing aesthetics, in order to seek a standard of the curriculum .Methods Students enrolled from 2012 to 2013 were included as the study subjects .According to the students'characteristics and the syllabus , group assignment , shape-up exercises and other tests were combined and applied .At the end of the curriculum , students were surveyed by the questionnaire .Results Scene simulation examination was the most popular way of evaluation , accounting for 44.3%.The etiquette test and ward design assignment were at the second place of popularity , accounting for 26.7% and 23.3%.Paper writing was the least favorite way of evaluation , accounting for 5.7%.Totals of 93.9%of the students thought the content of evaluation could fully reflect the teaching effects , 84.2%of the students thought the content of evaluation could generally reflect the teaching effects , 92.2% of the students thought the content of the evaluation were suitable .The degree of favor of the theoretical instruction and scene simulation in different genders had no significant difference (χ2 =0.027, 1.079, respectively;P>0.05 ) .The degree of favor of the etiquette and makeup class in different genders had significant differences (χ2=6.339-57.295;P <0.05).Conclusions Diversified evaluation methods can reflect the effect of humanistic classes.
展开▼
