ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of ultrasonic atomization with heat and oxygenation on prognosis of phlegm pneumonia patients.MethodsA total of 100 phlegm pneumonia patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received traditional oxygen atomization, and the observation group received ultrasonic atomization with heat and oxygenation. Curative effects of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe observation group had clinically total effective rate as 98% and symptom improvement rate as 86%. Those in the control group were 80% and 62%. The differences between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05). The observation group had much shorter fever subsidence time than the control group (P<0.05). The observation group had much higher sputum excretion rate after atomization as 94% than 72% of the control group (P<0.05). All cases in the observation group had successful atomization, while there were 8 cases with compelled termination of atomization. Their difference had statistical significance (P<0.05).ConclusionImplement of ultrasonic atomization with heat and oxygenation for phlegm pneumonia patients can increase clinically total effective rate and symptom improvement rate, shorten disease course, and improve sputum excretion effect after atomization. This method can guarantee successful atomization process, and it provides precise significant for improving prognosis and patients' quality of life.%目的探讨脓痰肺炎采用加温加氧超声雾化治疗对预后的影响.方法100例脓痰肺炎患者, 随机分为对照组和观察组, 各50例.对照组患者采用传统氧气雾化, 观察组患者采用加温加氧超声雾化, 比较两组患者治疗效果.结果观察组临床总有效率为98%, 症状改善率为86%, 对照组临床总有效率为80%, 症状改善率为62%, 两组比较, 差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组退热时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组雾化后排痰率为94%, 明显高于对照组72%(P<0.05);观察组均顺利完成雾化吸入, 对照组被迫停止雾化吸入8例, 比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论针对脓痰肺炎患者, 采用加温加氧超声雾化吸入治疗, 可使临床总有效率和症状改善率提高, 缩短病程, 提高雾化后排痰效果, 并保障雾化过程顺利完成, 对改善预后, 提高患者生存质量意义显著.
展开▼
