医学论文科学水平的评价探讨

摘要

In the management of scientific research achievements,the phenomenon of taking the quality of its journal as the quality of the paper has been criticized,but the evaluation method to a single paper is not so matured,and the evaluation to scientific level of paper is even rarer.The evaluation methods can he divided into direct and indirect ways.This paper mainly discussed the former.The scientific level of medical paper is mainly reflected in the probabilistic of the investigation.and it can be divided into several levels from the perspective of evidence-based medicine.For clinical research.the scientific level is mainly reflected in the generalized statistical aspects.Construction of medical papers evaluation system must first define the purpose and the subject.Evaluation methods should be considered from research design.statistical analysis,inference of conclusions,and reporting of statistics.Further,a comprehensive scale or a certain aspect of the evaluation methods can be developed.Among the methods,the simplest must be the form evaluation.%在科研成果的管理中,以刊论文的方法已经遭到非议,而对论文的评价研究却很少,对科学水平的评价则更是罕见.论文的评价可分为直接评价和间接评价.本文主要讨论前者.医学论文的科学性主要体现在研究的概率性,从循证医学的角度可以分为多个层次,而临床研究的科学性则主要体现在其广义统计学方面.构建医学论文评价体系首先必须明确评价的目的和主体.评价的方法可以从科研设计、统计分析、结论的推断、统计报告等方面考虑,进而研究出综合性的量表或某侧面的评价方法,最简单的应是形式方面的评价.