首页> 中文期刊> 《中华临床营养杂志》 >快速康复外科在胃癌患者围手术期应用的临床效果

快速康复外科在胃癌患者围手术期应用的临床效果

摘要

目的 评价围手术期快速康复外科方案在胃癌患者中应用的临床效果.方法 根据入选标准,82例胃癌患者进入本研究并随机分为两组,每组41例,一组为应用快速康复外科方案的研究组,另一组为应用传统方法的对照组.比较两组术后首次排便时间、术后住院时间、住院总费用和术后并发症的发生率.结果 研究组术后首次排便时间为(45.58±26.91)h,显著早于对照组的(58.01±23.5)h(P=0.0287),术后住院时间为(9.4±3.3)d,显著短于对照组的(12.4±3.6)d(P=0.0002),住院总费用为(2.96±0.44)万元,显著少于对照组的(3.46±0.34)万元(P<0.0001).研究组和对照组并发症发生率分别为7.3%和17.1%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.232).结论 围手术期应用快速康复外科方案可以明显加快胃癌患者术后康复,缩短术后住院时间,降低医疗费用.%Objective To evaluate the benefits of perioperative fast-track surgery (FTS) program on clinical outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Totally, 82 patients were randomly allocated into FTS group (n = 41; received perioperative FTS program) and control group (n = 41; received a conventional therapy). The postoperative first defecation time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenditure, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The postoperative first defecation time and postoperative hospital stay were (45.58 ± 26.91 ) h and (9.4 ± 3. 3 ) d in FT3 group and (58.01 ± 23.5 ) h and ( 12. 4 ±3.6 )d in control group (P = 0. 0287 and P = 0. 0002, respectively). Hospitalization expenditure was significantly lower in FTS group than that in control group [(2. 96 ± 0.44 ) yuan vs. ( 3.46 ± 0. 34 ) × 104 yuan, P < 0. 0001 ).The complication was not significantly different between the two groups (7.3% vs. 17.1% , P =0. 232). Conclusion Perioperative FTS program can accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, shorten hospital stay, and decrease medical costs in patients with gastric cancer.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号