两种不同通气方式治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察

摘要

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of two kinds of different ventilation modes in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Methods In our hospital from May 2013 to April 2015 period from acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with 70 cases, and wil be divided into two groups, 35 cases of patients in each group, select high frequency shock ventilation in the treatment of patients into the treatment group and choose constant frequency mechanical ventilation in the treatment of patients with design as control group, compared two groups of patients after clinical curative effect.Results After the treatment group were treated with high frequency oscilatory ventilation, compared with the control group, the blood gas analysis index was significantly better than the control group (P< 0.05).Conclusion High frequency oscilatory mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome syndrome clinical effect is remarkable, and effectively improve the patients of oxygenation, and prognosis of the work lays a foundation.%目的 本文就两种不同通气方式治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效进行对比.方法 选择我院从2013年5月~ 2015年4月期间收治急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者70例,并将其平均分为两组,每组患者35例,选择高频震荡通气治疗的患者设为治疗组,选择常频机械通气治疗的患者设为对照组,比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效.结果 治疗组患者选择高频震荡通气治疗后,同对照组患者选择常频通气治疗相比,其血气分析指标明显好于对照组(P< 0.05).结论高频震荡通气治疗机械呼吸窘迫综合征的临床效果显著,同时有效改善患者的氧合功能,并为预后工作奠定基础.