首页> 中文期刊> 《中外医疗 》 >探究呼吸内科护理中重症患者的护理方法及效果探讨

探究呼吸内科护理中重症患者的护理方法及效果探讨

             

摘要

Objective To investigate the nursing method for patients with severe respiratory medicine disease and the nursing ef-fect. Methods 120 patients with severe respiratory medicine disease admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to February 2015 were selected and randomly and equally divided into the observation group and the control group. 60 cases in the control group were given the conventional nursing, and 60 cases in the observation group were given the professional systematic nursing inter-vention. And the clinical effect, activity of rehabilitation and nursing satisfaction were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results After nursing, the overall clinical nursing effective rate was much higher in the observation group than in the con-trol group(94.33% vs 80.00%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction score was much higher in the observation group than that in the control group [(93.17±2.33) vs (74.61±4.67)] points, the difference was statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with severe respiratory medicine disease, systematic nursing intervention can achieve signif-icant clinical effect, which is conducive to improving the clinical nursing quality and patient satisfaction, reducing the mortality ef-fectively and promoting the early rehabilitation, so it is worthy of promotion.%目的:探究呼吸内科护理中重症患者的护理方法及效果。方法随机选取该院2013年1月-2015年2月收治的120例呼吸内科重症患者±据随机平均的原则分为观察组与对照组两组。对照组60例患者采取常规护理措施,观察组60例患者在此基础上采取专业的系统护理干预措施。对两组患者的临床效果、康复积极性及护理满意度进行分析与比较。结果观察组60例患者经护理后临床总有效率为94.33%,对照组60例患者临床总有效率为80.00%,观察组总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组护理满意度评分为(93.17±2.33)分,对照组满意度评分为(74.61±4.67)分,观察组护理满意度评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对呼吸内科重症患者采取专业的系统护理干预能取得显著的临床效果,有利于提高临床护理质量与患者满意度,并且能有效降低死亡率、促进患者早日康复,值得推广。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号