论自首制度在司法适用中的认定——以交通肇事案件为视角

摘要

The Traffic Accident Whether has surrendered problem has always been a focus of controversy theorists and practical,in judicial practice,has different judgment in different places,resulting in the phenomenon of "codefendant different sentence" in judicial practice,the Supreme People's Court is affirmed in the form of judicial interpretation.Traffic Accident alarm and remain at the scene waiting to be processed,whether it should be regarded as an automatic surrendered voluntarily surrendered to the nature of the system,and surrendered the key is how to understand.Traffic Accident alarm and stay in the behavior of the field waiting to be processed is in full compliance with the voluntary surrender of the time,manner and purpose requirements.The behavior of police and retain the site waiting to be processed after the Traffic Accident identified as surrendered is proper meaning surrendered the system,and is in line with the original intention of the legislation and the essential characteristics of surrendered.Their behavior is also the administrative law obligations,but that does not negate the surrender,they will perform the evaluation of the administrative law obligations for the criminal law on the obligations ,no violations of the ban repeat evaluation principles conform to surrender conditions, should be recognized as surrender.%交通肇事案件是否存在自首问题,历来都是理论界及实务界的一大争议焦点。各地判决不一,导致司法实践中出现＂同案不同判＂现象。本文认为,交通肇事后报警并留在现场等候处理的行为完全符合自动投案的时间、方式及目的性要求。将交通肇事后报警并留住现场等候处理的行为认定为自动投案,是自首制度的应有之义,符合自首的立法初衷和本质特征。其行为虽也是行政法规定的义务,但并不因此否定自首的成立,将履行行政法上的义务评价为刑法上的义务,不违反禁止重复评价原则,符合自首条件的,应当认定为自首。