首页> 外文学位 >Do Not Enter: Restrictions and Access at Greek Sanctuary Sites
【24h】

Do Not Enter: Restrictions and Access at Greek Sanctuary Sites

机译:不要输入:希腊保护区的限制和访问权限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Examining the accessibility and restrictions of sacred spaces in the Ancient Greek world can help us to better understand the past use of the space and the community that oversaw the space. Ancient literary sources give hints on how the conceptualized boundaries (the temenos, abaton, and adyton) of sacred sites functioned and affected access to sites. Literary and epigraphic evidence indicate general restrictions placed on visitors to sanctuaries, relating to such issues as purity and gender regulations.;Archaeological remains can help to determine the ways that spatial configurations at sites might have reflected potential sacred restrictions. The literary evidence and the archaeological remains both indicate a pattern in terms of accessibility at sanctuary sites. When political control or complexity increases in a community, the shrines under the influence of those communities develop more restrictions and regulations. Evidence from Minoan peak sanctuaries, Mycenaean sanctuaries within palatial centers, and Archaic-Classical sanctuaries suggests that access at sanctuary sites were dictated to a large degree by political control. At times when political complexity and competition increased within communities, tighter restrictions can be seen developing at sacred sites controlled by these communities. The exception to this pattern of development seems to be rural and mountaintop sanctuaries.;Rural and mountaintop sanctuaries are often more removed from political regulation and are instead run by smaller local settlements. These sites appear to have fewer restrictions imposed on them by governmental bodies, and instead tend to develop strong mythic traditions and superstitions that serve to enforce behavior and access at the sites. The region of Arkadia displays this alternative model of developments and can be seen in the development of sites like Mt. Lykaion. These access and restrictions patterns can provide insight into the political and religious lives of the communities in charge of sanctuaries.
机译:检查古希腊世界中神圣空间的可访问性和限制条件可以帮助我们更好地了解空间的过往使用以及对空间进行监督的社区。古代文学资料暗示了神圣地点的概念化边界(temenos,abaton和adyton)如何起作用并影响到地点的访问。文学和人口学证据表明,对庇护所游客的一般限制,涉及到诸如纯洁和性别规定等问题。考古遗迹可以帮助确定场所的空间形态可能反映了潜在的神圣限制的方式。文学证据和考古遗迹都表明了在圣地的可及性。当社区的政治控制或复杂性增加时,受这些社区影响的神社会制定更多的限制和法规。来自米诺斯峰庇护所,宫殿中心内的迈锡尼庇护所和古古典庇护所的证据表明,庇护所所在地点的进入很大程度上受政治控制。当社区内部的政治复杂性和竞争加剧时,可以看到在这些社区控制的神圣地点发展了更严格的限制。这种发展模式的例外似乎是农村和山顶庇护所。;农村和山顶庇护所通常从政治法规中移开,而由较小的地方定居点经营。这些站点似乎没有受到政府机构的限制,而是倾向于发展强大的神话传统和迷信,以加强站点的行为和访问权限。阿卡迪亚(Arkadia)地区展示了这种替代发展模式,可以从Mt. Lykaion。这些访问和限制方式可以洞悉负责庇护所的社区的政治和宗教生活。

著录项

  • 作者

    Welch-Zaricor, Grace.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Archaeology.;Classical studies.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 133 p.
  • 总页数 133
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号