首页> 外文学位 >Fracture characteristics of asphalt concrete in Mode I, Mode II, and Mixed-mode.
【24h】

Fracture characteristics of asphalt concrete in Mode I, Mode II, and Mixed-mode.

机译:模式I,模式II和混合模式下沥青混凝土的断裂特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To this point, most research in asphalt concrete has focused on Mode I, or opening, cracking. However, a recent full-scale test section at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) showed that cracks did not form in pure Mode I. If the cracks traveled vertically, the cracks could be considered a pure opening displacement, or Mode I, failure. However, the cracks did not form vertically, but instead traveled at an angle, indicating that there was also some sliding displacement, or Mode II, occurring. The combination of Mode I and Mode II can be referred to as Mixed-Mode.;This research began with a review of existing Mode I literature for asphalt concrete. In order to develop a strong understanding of the Mode I behavior of asphalt concrete, 28 asphalt concrete mixtures were tested using the Disk-Shaped Compact Tension Test, which captures fracture energy (Gf). These mixtures included 11 different types of asphalt cement, three testing temperatures, two different types of aggregate, two different levels of air voids, and two different contents of asphalt cement. In addition, two Mode I fracture tests were compared: the Disk-Shaped Compact Tension Test and the Single-Edge Notch Beam Test.;Three mixtures from the full-scale test sections discussed above were used to develop and validate a new Mode II test for asphalt concrete. No previous literature was found that attempted to capture Mode II fracture energy in asphalt concrete, so a test was developed from an extensive review of Mode II tests in the fields of metal, plastic, and PCC. Limited work has been performed in Mixed-Mode testing of asphalt concrete, but only Crack Mouth Opening Displacement (CMOD) was used. This research captured the Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) and Crack Tip Sliding Displacement (CTSD) in addition to CMOD. This allowed the comparison of three different values of fracture energy, or work, depending on the location and orientation of the data collection gages. Finally, the three asphalt concrete mixtures studied were simulated in Mode I to determine the total external work, with a break down of this work into the dissipated fracture energy, recoverable strain energy, and dissipated creep energy.
机译:到目前为止,大多数沥青混凝土研究都集中在模式I(即开裂)上。但是,伊利诺伊大学厄本那-香槟分校(UIUC)最近进行的全面测试部分表明,在纯模式I下不会形成裂纹。如果裂纹垂直传播,则裂纹可被视为纯开口位移或模式。我,失败。但是,裂纹不是垂直形成的,而是以一定角度传播的,表明还存在一些滑动位移或模式II。模式I和模式II的组合可以称为混合模式。本研究始于对沥青混凝土的现有模式I文献进行回顾。为了深入了解沥青混凝土的I型行为,使用盘形紧凑拉伸试验测试了28种沥青混凝土混合物,该试验可以捕获断裂能(Gf)。这些混合物包括11种不同类型的沥青水泥,三种测试温度,两种不同类型的骨料,两种不同水平的气孔以及两种不同含量的沥青水泥。此外,还比较了两种模式I的断裂试验:盘形紧凑拉伸试验和单边缺口梁试验。上面讨论的满量程试验部分的三种混合物用于开发和验证新的模式II试验用于沥青混凝土。以前没有文献试图捕获沥青混凝土中的II型断裂能,因此通过对金属,塑料和PCC领域中的II型试验的广泛审查,开发了一种试验。在沥青混凝土的混合模式测试中仅进行了有限的工作,但仅使用了裂口张开位移(CMOD)。这项研究除了CMOD以外,还捕获了裂纹尖端开口位移(CTOD)和裂纹尖端滑动位移(CTSD)。这样就可以根据数据采集量规的位置和方向比较三个不同的断裂能或功值。最后,在模式I下对三种研究的沥青混凝土混合物进行了模拟,以确定总的外部功,并将此功分解为耗散的断裂能,可恢复的应变能和耗散的蠕变能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Braham, Andrew Franz.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号