首页> 外文学位 >The possibility to achieve: A mixed methods comparison of street children, former street children, and school children in Tanzania.
【24h】

The possibility to achieve: A mixed methods comparison of street children, former street children, and school children in Tanzania.

机译:实现的可能性:坦桑尼亚流浪儿童,前流浪儿童和学童的混合方法比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation compares culturally-constructed understandings of achievement among street children (n=60, Mage=14.8), former street children (n=63, Mage =13.1), and school-going children (n=60, M age=15.6) in Tanzania. It does so by considering children's divergent living contexts and their shared context of Kilimanjaro.;Street children's emergent themes indicated a "heroic" orientation that was tempered by "paralytic" achievement strategies. Emergent themes in former street children's stories displayed a "determined" orientation, complemented by "choice" strategies which signified careful decision-making. School children's emergent themes showed a "deserved" orientation which was related to "control" strategies. Emergent codes specified a spectrum of possibility to achieve: street children's constructions reflected a fantasy possibility, former street children's reflected a realistic possibility, and school children's reflected an idealized possibility. The resulting model suggests that groups construct meaning of achievement differently, but share achievement concerns according to the collective knowledge of "a difficult life" in Kilimanjaro (Vavrus, 2003).;Quantitative data were responses to the Importance Scale which measured children's perceived value of life events. Through ANOVA, contingency tables, and Bonferroni post-hoc analyses, the data demonstrate that former street children and school children were similar, and both different from street children. However, all groups shared values on particular life events, indicating collective ideologies concerning, for example, being happy and going to school. Significant differences between street children and the other groups illustrate the importance of basic needs, especially when they are unmet. These findings offer reasons, by tangible life events, for differences in achievement constructions.;Implications involve including achievement consequences into achievement models, using longitudinal designs, examining causal relationships between living context and achievement understandings, using complementary theoretical frameworks, and paying more attention to street children's agency and contributions to success.;Qualitative data were short-story responses to the adapted Thematic Apperception Test (Morgan & Murray, 1935). Achievement-related narratives generated from this projective test, which are typically analyzed diagnostically, were instead analyzed thematically. Here, stories were used as the basis for establishing an emic coding system. Member-checking, multiple coders, blind coding, and triangulation were used to help ensure validity and reliability of codes.
机译:本文比较了流浪儿童(n = 60,法师= 14.8),前流浪儿童(n = 63,法师= 13.1)和上学儿童(n = 60,M年龄= 15.6)对文化成就的理解。在坦桑尼亚。这样做是通过考虑儿童的不同生活环境和乞力马扎罗山的共同环境来实现的。街头儿童的新兴主题表明了一种“英雄主义”的取向,并受到“麻痹性”成就策略的限制。前流浪街头儿童故事中出现的主题表现出“确定的”方向,辅之以“选择”策略,这表示需要谨慎决策。小学生出现的主题表现出与“控制”策略有关的“应有”取向。新兴规范规定了要实现的可能性范围:流浪儿童的构造反映了幻想的可能性,前流浪儿童的构造反映了现实的可能性,而学龄儿童则反映了理想化的可能性。由此产生的模型表明,群体对成就的意义有不同的理解,但根据乞力马扎罗山对“艰难生活”的集体认识,分享成就关注点(Vavrus,2003年)。人生大事。通过方差分析,列联表和Bonferroni事后分析,数据表明前流浪儿童和学童相似,并且都不同于流浪儿童。但是,所有群体在特定的生活事件上都具有共同的价值观,表明了关于例如快乐和上学的集体意识形态。流浪儿童与其他群体之间的显着差异说明了基本需求的重要性,尤其是当他们没有得到满足时。这些发现为有形的生活事件提供了成就结构差异的原因。含意包括将成就后果纳入成就模型,使用纵向设计,研究生活情境与成就理解之间的因果关系,使用互补的理论框架,并更加关注流浪儿童的代理机构和对成功的贡献。;定性数据是对经过改编的主题知觉测验的短篇反应(Morgan&Murray,1935年)。从这项投射测验中产生的与成就相关的叙述,通常会进行诊断分析,而会进行专题分析。在这里,故事被用作建立emic编码系统的基础。使用成员检查,多个编码器,盲编码和三角剖分来帮助确保代码的有效性和可靠性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nalkur, Priya Gersappa.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号