首页> 外文学位 >Pain management in nursing home residents with cancer and dementia with and without hospice services.
【24h】

Pain management in nursing home residents with cancer and dementia with and without hospice services.

机译:有和没有临终关怀服务的患有癌症和痴呆症的养老院居民的疼痛管理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aims. We sought to identify differences in pain management between two groups: nursing home residents with malignant cancer and dementia with and without hospice services.;Methods. Decedent records from 2003-2009 were assessed for diagnosis of dementia and cause of death as cancer. Ten malignant cancer diagnoses were determined a priori from the CDC 2004 data on the top 10 malignant cancers for all races and genders. Fifty-five decedents from 10 nursing homes were included in the final sample. Four instruments were used: Minimum Data Set (MDS) a standardized assessment tool required of most U.S. nursing homes. A large comprehensive assessment is conducted yearly followed by smaller quarterly assessments. The MDS collects demographic and diagnostic variables, as well as clinical, functional, psychosocial, and cognitive assessments. Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS scored from 1 borderline-intact to 6 very severe impairment); Discomfort Behavior Scale (DBS scored from 0 no discomfort behavior identified to 102 maximum identifiable discomfort behavior); and Equivalent Dose Units (EDU's) of opioid analgesic calculated and totaled over the last 2 weeks of life. We calculated the CPS score from the admission MDS because we believed cognitive levels were unlikely to improve over time. DBS scores were calculated from the last MDS prior to death in an effort to capture active cancer pain at the end-of-life. We realized the last MDS assessment might have been in the previous 90 days. The study received exempt status from the office of human protection.;Results. Total EDU's were significantly greater among hospice enrollees (U 226.5, p .05). There is a significantly greater likelihood of being prescribed a scheduled narcotic analgesic (OR 5.5; 95% CI 1.8-18.8) and a PRN narcotic analgesic (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.2-11.3) when enrolled in hospice. Nursing home residents not enrolled in hospice had a significantly (U 195.0, p .01) lower CPS scores than those enrolled in hospice. Decedents with lower cognitive levels were more likely (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.6-15.6) to have a DBS score of zero. Forty percent of decedents with metastatic cancer and dementia received no opioid during the last 2 weeks of life.;Conclusions. We have demonstrated that pain among nursing home residents with dementia and cancer is a serious problem. Forty percent of our decedents received no opioid at the end of life. None (n = 12) of the subjects identified in the lowest CPS score (6) category were enrolled in hospice. One reason appears to be blunted pain related behaviors. Among the severely cognitively impaired whose pain behaviors become blunted, scheduled pain medications may be the best way to manage their pain. Pain behavioral tools are better suited for individuals with mild and moderate cognitive impairment but become less reliable in the severely cognitively impaired. New methods for assessing pain in this highly vulnerable population are needed.
机译:目的我们试图确定两组患者在疼痛管理上的差异:有和没有临终关怀服务的患有恶性癌症和痴呆症的疗养院居民。评估2003年至2009年的后代记录,以诊断痴呆和癌症死亡原因。根据CDC 2004数据,对所有种族和性别的前10名恶性肿瘤进行了10次恶性肿瘤诊断。最终样本中包括来自10个疗养院的55名死者。使用了四种工具:最小数据集(MDS),这是大多数美国养老院所需的标准化评估工具。每年进行一次大型综合评估,然后进行较小规模的季度评估。 MDS收集人口统计和诊断变量,以及临床,功能,社会心理和认知评估。认知表现量表(CPS评分从1个完整边界评分到6个非常严重损害评分);不适行为量表(DBS评分从0(未发现不适行为)到102最大可识别的不适行为);以及在生命的最后2周内计算得出的阿片类镇痛药的等效剂量单位(EDU)。我们根据入院MDS计算了CPS分数,因为我们认为认知水平不太可能随着时间的推移而提高。从死亡前的最后一个MDS计算DBS分数,以期在生命周期结束时捕获活动性癌症疼痛。我们意识到上一次MDS评估可能是在过去90天内。该研究获得了人类保护办公室的豁免资格;结果。临终患者中的EDU总数显着更高(U 226.5,p <.05)。当被纳入临终关怀时,被处方使用麻醉性镇痛药(OR 5.5; 95%CI 1.8-18.8)和PRN麻醉性镇痛药(OR 3.6; 95%CI 1.2-11.3)的可能性要大得多。未参加临终关怀的疗养院居民的CPS得分显着低于(U 195.0,p <.01)。认知水平较低的后代更有可能(OR 4.9; 95%CI 1.6-15.6)的DBS得分为零。在生命的最后两周内,有40%的患有转移性癌症和痴呆症的后遗症患者未接受任何阿片类药物治疗。我们已经证明,患有痴呆症和癌症的疗养院居民中的疼痛是一个严重的问题。 40%的前辈在生命的尽头没有得到任何阿片类药物。在最低CPS评分(6)类别中确定的受试者中,没有(n = 12)被纳入临终关怀。原因之一似乎是与疼痛有关的钝化行为。在严重的认知障碍者的疼痛行为变得迟钝的情况下,定期镇痛药物可能是控制其疼痛的最佳方法。疼痛行为工具更适合于轻度和中度认知障碍的人,但在严重的认知障碍者中变得不太可靠。需要新的方法来评估这一高度脆弱人群的疼痛。

著录项

  • 作者

    Monroe, Todd Bryant.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee Health Science Center.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Tennessee Health Science Center.;
  • 学科 Gerontology.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 74 p.
  • 总页数 74
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号