首页> 外文学位 >To teach and to entertain: The production of legal culture in 16th and 17th century China.
【24h】

To teach and to entertain: The production of legal culture in 16th and 17th century China.

机译:教导和娱乐:16和17世纪中国的法律文化产生。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and Method of Study. Dawning primarily on literature in the sociology of culture, this research examines the meanings and the production of a special dimension of legal culture in 16th and 17 th century China.;Findings and Conclusions. This research examines the legal culture as presented in 348 case stories published in 16th and 17th century China. It demonstrates how it is significantly different from the hegemonic legal culture prevailed in this period as it focuses on crimes and the judicial process, takes an instrumental approach to courtrooms that represented legal order and judges who represented the governmental authorities, and places more confidence and hope in the universal rules of justice than in legal rules and legal agents. Focusing on human agents, the producers (mainly book merchants and grass-roots scholars), and utilizing the key concept "social resource", this research reveals how this legal culture was produced. It argues that the producers actively translated their intentions into the production principles, i.e.,"to teach" and "to entertain". Guided by these principles, producers creatively appropriated and utilized the social resources they brought into the culture production process and shaped the features of the legal culture they produced. This research demonstrates how social members who had little legal and political power actively participated in the production and dissemination of legal culture in 16th and 17th century China fueled by economic prosperity and commercialization process. This research strenghthens and extends concepts and theories in the sociology of culture.
机译:研究范围和方法。本研究主要研究文化社会学中的文学,研究16世纪和17世纪中国法律文化的特殊含义和产生。;发现与结论。这项研究考察了16世纪和17世纪中国出版的348个案例中的法律文化。它展示了它与这一时期盛行的霸权法律文化有何显着不同,因为它着重于犯罪和司法程序,对代表法律秩序的法庭和代表政府当局的法官采取了工具性的态度,并给予了更多的信心和希望在普遍的司法规则中比在法律规则和法律代理人中。以人为主体,生产者(主要是书商和基层学者)为重点,并利用关键概念“社会资源”,本研究揭示了这种法律文化是如何产生的。它认为生产者积极地将他们的意图转化为生产原则,即“教书”和“娱乐”。在这些原则的指导下,生产者创造性地使用和利用了他们带入文化生产过程中的社会资源,并塑造了其生产的法律文化的特征。这项研究表明,在经济繁荣和商业化进程的推动下,缺乏法律和政治权力的社会成员如何积极参与16和17世纪中国的法律文化的生产和传播。这项研究加强和扩展了文化社会学中的概念和理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, Yanhong.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 276 p.
  • 总页数 276
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;社会学理论与方法论;社会结构和社会关系;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号