首页> 外文学位 >Race, Ethnicity, Economics, and Federalism: State Sentiment Regarding Noncitizens from 2009 to 2014
【24h】

Race, Ethnicity, Economics, and Federalism: State Sentiment Regarding Noncitizens from 2009 to 2014

机译:种族,种族,经济和联邦制:2009年至2014年有关非公民的国家情绪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the causes and means of state legislative action on immigration in the United States along a range of policy issues from 2009 to 2014. The work begins by placing the phenomenon of immigration restriction and accommodation in its historical context, alongside other instances of localized opposition to demographic change. Next, I examine the state-level demographic changes which occurred during the last Census period, from 2001 to 2010. I find that Latino population growth occurred heaviest in rural states with large African American populations. I then turn to analyze state restrictions placed on noncitizens residing in the American states. I find that the growth rates of the foreign-born, Asian, and Latino populations all associate with restriction. Also, states with weaker economies and conservative populations tended to adopt restrictive immigration policies. Following this, I examine state accommodations and find that the respective sizes of the foreign-born, Asian, and Latino populations are associated with accommodation, suggesting that these groups demonstrate cohesiveness and look out for noncitizens that are affected by state policies. After considering both restrictions and accommodations separately, I create a sentiment score which measures each state's overall policy posture on the issue of immigration. This score differentiates states such that a state with many accommodations and fewer restrictions is ranked higher than a state with few accommodations and many restrictions, and vice versa. Models are developed to explain these scores. I find that the states altered their behavior in 2012, and from that year on they enact more accommodations than restrictions. I conclude by examining the role of immigration in the 2016 presidential election. I find that as states are less accommodating and more restrictive, Trump's probability of winning the state went up, controlling for other factors.
机译:本文从2009年至2014年一系列政策问题研究了州立法对美国移民采取法律行动的起因和手段。这项工作首先将移民限制和适应现象纳入其历史背景,以及其他本地化案例。反对人口变化。接下来,我研究了在2001年至2010年的上一个人口普查时期内发生的州级人口变化。我发现拉丁美洲裔人口的增长在拥有大量非洲裔美国人的农村州中发生得最多。然后,我转向分析对居住在美国各州的非公民施加的州限制。我发现,外国出生,亚洲和拉丁美洲裔人口的增长率都与限制有关。此外,经济较弱且人口保守的州往往会采取限制性移民政策。在此之后,我检查了州的住宿条件,发现在外国出生,亚洲和拉丁美洲裔人口的各自规模与住宿条件有关,这表明这些群体表现出凝聚力,并寻找受国家政​​策影响的非公民。在分别考虑限制和住宿条件之后,我创建了一个情绪评分,用于衡量每个州在移民问题上的总体政策态势。该分数区分州,从而使住宿和限制较少的州的排名高于住宿和限制较少的州,反之亦然。开发模型来解释这些分数。我发现各州在2012年改变了自己的行为,从那一年起,他们制定了更多的限制措施而不是限制措施。最后,我考察了移民在2016年总统大选中的作用。我发现,由于各州不那么宽容和更具限制性,特朗普在赢得其他州的控制权的可能性也有所提高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Márquez, Timothy.;

  • 作者单位

    Northern Illinois University.;

  • 授予单位 Northern Illinois University.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Public policy.;Demography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 172 p.
  • 总页数 172
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号