首页> 外文学位 >From dark earth to Domesday: Towns in Anglo-Saxon England.
【24h】

From dark earth to Domesday: Towns in Anglo-Saxon England.

机译:从黑暗的地球到世界末日:英格兰盎格鲁撒克逊人的城镇。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The towns that the Norman invaders found in England in 1066 had far longer and far more complex histories than have often been conveyed in the historiography of the Anglo-Saxon period. This lack of depth is not surprising, however, as the study of the towns of Anglo-Saxon England has long been complicated by a dearth of textual sources and by the work of influential historians who have measured the urban status of Anglo-Saxon settlements using the attributes of late medieval towns as their gage. These factors have led to a schism amongst historian regarding when the first towns developed in Anglo-Saxon England and about which historical development marks the beginning of the continuous history of the English towns. This dissertation endeavors to apply new evidence and new methodologies to questions related to the development, status, and nature of Anglo-Saxon urban communities in order to provide a greater insight into their origins and their evolutionary trajectories.;It is the argument of this work that the emporia of the sixth through nine centuries were indeed towns and that the burhs founded by Alfred the Great and his heirs were intended from their inception to be towns and were quickly recognized as such by contemporaries. Two distinct methodologies are used to support these arguments: The first uses recent archeological and numismatic data related to the settlements in question to determine if the size and occupational make-up of their populations, the complexity and diversity of their economies, and their integration into regional and cross-Channel exchange networks sufficiently differentiated them from contemporary rural sites and places them in a distinct, urban category. The second methodology employs contemporary texts including the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, The Old English Orosius, and The Old English Martyrology to reveal the terms actually used by the Anglo-Saxons to describe their settlements and then compares those terms to the words used to describe places that the Anglo-Saxons would have definitively recognized as a town or a city, such as Rome or Jerusalem.;Regarding the continuity of Anglo-Saxon towns, recent archaeological data is used to prove that the periods of time which have often been cited as breaks in occupation were actually moments of transition from one type of town to another. At London, for example, we can now see that there was no substantive gap between the end of the extramural emporium of Lundenwic and earliest evidence for secular settlement within the walls of the former Roman town during the ninth century when it was refortified as a burh. This indicates that we should trace the continuous history of many towns, like London, back beyond Alfred and his burhs, to the emporia and other settlements that preceded them.;Another major theme that threads its way through this work is that the Anglo-Saxon towns were negotiated spaces defined by the interplay of different groups of people and different ideas. Kings and bishops certainly exerted a great deal of influence over the development of the Anglo-Saxon towns, but, by no means were they the only forces at work. The common craftsmen and traders who lived and worked in the towns and the lesser elites and royal officials who lorded over them shaped the physical and social environments of the towns, their regional and cross-Channel connections, and how their economies functioned. Different groups of foreigners also influenced the Anglo-Saxon towns through trade, evangelism, and, at times, violence. Moreover, in so much as any of these groups or individuals may have exerted a greater influence over the development of the Anglo-Saxon towns at one time or another, no single group--be it kings, bishops, elites, traders, craftsmen, or assorted foreigners--can ever be said to have been acting totally independently of the others. In short, this dissertation illustrates that the towns of Anglo-Saxon England were the products of complex networks that moved people, things, wealth, and ideas throughout regions and across seas.
机译:诺曼入侵者于1066年在英格兰发现的城镇的历史远比盎格鲁-撒克逊时期的历史学所传承的历史长得多。缺乏深度不足为奇,因为对英格兰盎格鲁-撒克逊定居点城镇的研究长期以来由于文本资料的匮乏以及有影响力的历史学家的工作而变得很复杂,这些学者通过测量盎格鲁-撒克逊定居点的城市地位来进行研究。中世纪晚期城镇的特征。这些因素导致了历史学家之间的分裂,即英格兰盎格鲁撒克逊何时建立了第一个城镇,以及哪个历史发展标志着英国城镇不断发展的历史。本文致力于将新的证据和新的方法应用于与盎格鲁-撒克逊城市社区的发展,地位和性质有关的问题,以便对它们的起源和演变轨迹有更深入的了解。这是这项工作的论据。第六到九个世纪的百货商店确实是城镇,而阿尔弗雷德大帝及其继承人建立的伯斯从一开始就打算成为城镇,并很快被当代人所认可。两种不同的方法被用来支持这些论点:第一种方法使用与有关定居点有关的最新考古和钱币学数据来确定其人口的规模和职业构成,其经济的复杂性和多样性以及是否融入其中区域和跨渠道的交换网络充分将它们与当代农村地区区分开来,并将它们置于独特的城市类别中。第二种方法采用当代文本,包括《盎格鲁-撒克逊纪事》,《古英语奥罗修斯》和《古英语教学》,以揭示盎格鲁-撒克逊人实际用来描述其定居点的术语,然后将这些术语与用来描述地点的词语进行比较盎格鲁撒克逊人将被最终确认为一个城镇或城市,例如罗马或耶路撒冷。关于盎格鲁撒克逊人的城镇的连续性,最近的考古数据被用来证明经常被引用为占领的中断实际上是从一种类型的城镇过渡到另一种类型的城镇的时刻。例如,在伦敦,我们现在可以看到,伦登维克城外商场的尽头与九世纪前罗马古城墙改建为世俗建筑时,世俗定居的最早证据之间没有实质性的差距。 。这表明我们应该追溯像伦敦这样的许多城镇的连续历史,这些历史可以追溯到阿尔弗雷德及其伯爵之外的历史悠久的Emporia和其他定居点;贯穿这项工作的另一个主要主题是盎格鲁撒克逊人城镇是由不同人群和不同观念的相互作用定义的协商空间。国王和主教无疑对盎格鲁-撒克逊城镇的发展产生了很大的影响,但绝不是他们唯一的力量。在城镇生活和工作的普通手工艺人和商人,以及在城镇上空统治的次要精英和皇室官员,塑造了城镇的物质和社会环境,它们之间的区域和跨海峡联系以及经济运作方式。不同种类的外国人还通过贸易,传福音以及有时甚至暴力来影响盎格鲁-撒克逊人的城镇。此外,这些团体或个人中的任何一个都可能一次或一次地对盎格鲁-撒克逊城镇的发展产生更大的影响,因此没有任何一个团体,包括国王,主教,精英,商人,手工艺人,或各种各样的外国人-可以说完全独立于其他人行事。简而言之,本文说明了英格兰盎格鲁撒克逊城镇是复杂网络的产物,这些网络将人,物,财富和思想在整个地区和整个海洋中传播。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crane, David D.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Medieval history.;European history.;Archaeology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 229 p.
  • 总页数 229
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号