首页> 外文学位 >Private domestic use of unmanned aerial vehicle: Is our legal system ready?
【24h】

Private domestic use of unmanned aerial vehicle: Is our legal system ready?

机译:国内私人使用无人机:我们的法律制度是否准备就绪?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The research completed in this paper was to analyze the current language of the United States legal system, reviewing civil law and criminal law at the state and federal level. This analysis was first to determine how the current legal system is covers malicious use of private unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Next, the research was to determine how civil law differed from criminal law in relation to the private use of UAVs. Lastly, the research hypothesizes how private UAVs will affect the United States legal system in the future. It was discovered that there are a growing number of legislative bills in congress and the senate now, including the Drone Reform Act, Drone Accountability Act, and Drone Aircraft Privacy and Transparency Act. None covers private use specifically, but some at the civil level and criminal level that possibly could, including tort trespassing, stalking, nuisance, and public distribution of private facts. United States Code title 18, crimes and criminal procedures, was analyzed for the federal portion of the research. Ohio state criminal code was used as the example for the state level. This was done in order to determine if the current language would be sufficient in covering UAVs. The results of the analysis for how UAVs could be sufficiently included in current laws were varied depending on whether a transportation method was specified in a crime or the phrase by any means was used. It was determined civil law is easier than criminal to include UAVs or change legislation relating to UAVs. Because it is easier to include UAVs in tort law, the technology will have less effect on civil law than criminal. Criminal law is more rigid at both the state and federal level so for those laws with specific methodology, it will have to change through the legislature. With the growing popularity of UAVs, reviews of legislation and court law will have to continue with the advancements in the technology.;Keywords: Cybersecurity, Christopher Riddell, Tim Sell.
机译:本文完成的研究旨在分析美国法律体系的当前语言,并在州和联邦一级对民法和刑法进行审查。这项分析首先是要确定当前的法律体系如何涵盖对私人无人驾驶飞机(UAV)的恶意使用。接下来,该研究将确定民法在无人机的私人使用方面与刑法有何不同。最后,研究假设私人无人机会在未来影响美国法律体系。人们发现,国会和参议院现在有越来越多的立法法案,包括《无人驾驶飞机改革法案》,《无人驾驶飞机问责制法案》和《无人驾驶飞机隐私和透明度法案》。没有一个专门涵盖私人用途,但可能涵盖民事和刑事一级的某些用途,包括侵权行为,跟踪,滋扰和私人事实的公共分发。对于研究的联邦部分,对《美国法典》第18章“犯罪和刑事诉讼程序”进行了分析。俄亥俄州的州刑法典被用作州一级的示例。这样做是为了确定当前的语言是否足以覆盖无人机。根据是否在犯罪中指定了运输方式或以任何方式使用了短语,对如何将无人机充分纳入现行法律的分析结果有所不同。人们认为,民法比无人机更容易适用于无人机或更改与无人机有关的法规。由于将无人机包括在侵权法中比较容易,因此该技术对民法的影响要小于刑事法。州和联邦两级的刑法都比较严格,因此对于那些具有特定方法论的法律,必须通过立法机构进行修改。随着无人机的日益普及,随着技术的发展,必须继续审查立法和法院法律。关键词:网络安全,克里斯托弗·里德尔,蒂姆·塞勒。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carpenter, Cari E.;

  • 作者单位

    Utica College.;

  • 授予单位 Utica College.;
  • 学科 Law.;Political Science Public Administration.;Computer Science.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 44 p.
  • 总页数 44
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号