首页> 外文学位 >Emotional Interference of Response Inhibition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
【24h】

Emotional Interference of Response Inhibition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

机译:强迫症中反应抑制的情绪干扰。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Researchers have hypothesized that failures of inhibition are partially responsible for habitual and perseverative symptoms that are unique to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). It is also well known that sequelae of emotional processes are also implicated in the etiology and maintenance of obsessions and compulsions. However, little research has tested how emotional processes moderate inhibitory functions in OCD. In the present study, high contamination phobic (HCP, n = 17) and low contamination phobic (LCP, n = 30) participants completed an emotional go/no-go task, which measured the interfering effects contamination-threat processing on action restraint. The present study had a two level between-subjects-quasi-independent factor (Group: LCP vs. HCP), and a two level within-subjects-experimental-factor (Threat: Contamination vs. Neutral). The proportion of errors of commission (failures of action restraint) was the primary dependent variable. There were three predictions: 1) for the main effect of Threat, it was predicted that the visual processing of contamination images would significantly interfere with action restraint (Contamination errors of commission > Neutral errors of commission); 2) for the main effect of Group, it was predicted that HCP participants would show poorer action restraint when compared to LCP participants (HCP errors of commission > LCP errors of commission); 3) for the Group x Threat interaction, it was predicted that the visual processing of contamination images would interfere more with action restraint among HCP than LCP participants (Contamination errors of commission among HCP participants > Neutral errors of commission among HCP participants, Neutral errors of commission among LCP participants, and Contamination errors of commission among LCP participants). Predictions 1 and 3 were supported by results while results failed to support the second prediction. These data suggest that the processing of emotionally arousing imagery interferes with action restraint and the magnitude of this effect is greater among an analogue OCD sample reporting contamination symptoms. These findings are clinically relevant and significantly extend etiological models of OCD by integrating basic neurocognitive and affective mechanisms. The unique and complimentary roles of emotional, attentional, and inhibitory processes in the etiology and maintenance of obsessions and compulsions are explored and updates to models of OCD are discussed.
机译:研究人员假设抑制失败是强迫症(OCD)特有的习惯性和持久性症状的部分原因。众所周知,情感过程的后遗症也与痴迷和强迫症的病因和维持有关。然而,很少有研究测试情绪过程如何缓解强迫症中的抑制功能。在本研究中,高污染恐惧感(HCP,n = 17)和低污染恐惧感(LCP,n = 30)参与者完成了情绪通过/不通过任务,该任务测量了污染威胁处理对行动约束的干扰作用。本研究具有两个水平的受试者之间准独立因素(组:LCP与HCP)和两个水平的受试者内部实验因素(威胁:污染与中性)。佣金错误的比例(限制行动失败)是主要的因变量。有三个预测:1)对于威胁的主要影响,可以预测污染图像的视觉处理将显着干扰动作约束(佣金污染误差>佣金中性误差); 2)对于小组的主要影响,据预测,与LCP参与者相比,HCP参与者表现出较差的行动约束(HCP佣金错误> LCP佣金错误); 3)对于Group x Threat交互作用,预计污染图像的视觉处理将比LCP参与者更多地干扰HCP之间的行动约束(HCP参与者之间的佣金污染误差> HCP参与者之间的佣金中性误差, LCP参与者之间的佣金,以及LCP参与者之间的佣金污染错误)。结果支持预测1和3,而结果则不能支持第二个预测。这些数据表明,对情绪唤起的图像的处理会干扰动作限制,并且在报告污染症状的模拟OCD样本中,这种影响的程度更大。这些发现与临床相关,并通过整合基本的神经认知和情感机制显着扩展了强迫症的病因模型。探讨了情绪,注意力和抑制过程在病因和维持强迫症中的独特和互补作用,并讨论了强迫症模型的更新。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adams, Thomas G., Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号