首页> 外文学位 >Self-other differences in risky decision making: An analysis of social values theory and construal-level theory.
【24h】

Self-other differences in risky decision making: An analysis of social values theory and construal-level theory.

机译:风险决策中的自我差异:对社会价值观理论和建构水平理论的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study seeks to explain self-other differences in decision making pertaining to risk through the comparison of social value theory (Stone & Allgaier, 2008) and construal-level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Research has demonstrated that in comparison to decisions for the self, individuals tend to be more risk-taking when giving advice or deciding for others in low-impact relationship scenarios (Beisswanger, Stone, Hupp, & Allgaier, 2003). Social value theory (Stone & Allgaier, 2008) proposes that advisers decide for others based on a social norm that emphasizes the importance of the social value. In contrast, construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010) suggests that individuals choose differently for others based on a higher-level mental construal that lends to more abstract thinking. Contrary to construal-level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), manipulations of mental construal mindset and temporal distance had no impact on the riskiness of the decision outcome in a low-impact relationship scenario. In line with social value theory (Stone & Allgaier, 2008), participants were riskier when making decisions for others than for themselves regardless of the mental mindset and temporal distance.
机译:本研究旨在通过比较社会价值理论(Stone和Allgaier,2008年)和建构水平理论(Trope和Liberman,2010年)来解释与风险相关的决策中的自我差异。研究表明,与自我决定相比,个人在低影响的关系场景中提供建议或为他人决定时倾向于承担更大的风险(Beisswanger,Stone,Hupp和Allgaier,2003年)。社会价值理论(Stone&Allgaier,2008)提出,顾问基于强调社会价值重要性的社会规范为他人做出决定。相比之下,建构主义水平的理论(Trope&Liberman,2010)表明,个人基于更高层次的心理建构来为他人选择不同的事物,从而有助于更抽象的思维。与解释水平理论(Trope&Liberman,2010)相反,在低影响的关系情境下,操纵精神解释心态和时间距离对决策结果的风险没有影响。与社会价值理论相一致(Stone&Allgaier,2008年),参与者在为他人做出决策时比为自己做出决策时的风险更大,无论其心理思维方式和时间距离如何。

著录项

  • 作者

    Palmer, Eleanor C.;

  • 作者单位

    Wake Forest University.;

  • 授予单位 Wake Forest University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.;Psychology Behavioral.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 55 p.
  • 总页数 55
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号