首页> 外文学位 >Engaging Citizens in Democratic Governance and the Decision-Making Process with Congressional Committees.
【24h】

Engaging Citizens in Democratic Governance and the Decision-Making Process with Congressional Committees.

机译:与国会委员会让公民参与民主治理和决策过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Democratic societies generally view the electoral process as constituting the means by which citizens express views on the performance of legislative officials in responding to public needs. While special interest groups have the means to shape and influence public policy outcomes through direct involvement with members and staff of the Congress, the general public does not typically participate in the process while legislation is being formulated. There is a gap in the literature regarding citizen engagement in the decision-making process which is problematic because the lack of active citizen involvement raises questions regarding the legitimacy of representation, and the adequacy of policies developed on behalf of the citizens. This study investigated the citizen's role with the Congress by exploring the evolution of theories of ancient thinkers, 17th and 18th century political philosophers, framers of the U.S. Constitution, and contemporary scholars and experts. Research questions centered on the current and most appropriate roles for citizens, and steps to enhance participation. Interviews with 10 citizens and 10 Congressional officials resulted in a citizen engagement theory, grounded in the data, indicating that campaign financing reform; increased citizen awareness; heightened media focus; and review of the impacts of redistricting, polling, and partisanship concerns are essential to citizen engagement in decision making with Congressional committees. Positive social change may result from increased dialogue on the subject among citizens, the Congress, the private sector, and academic scholars and researchers.
机译:民主社会通常将选举过程视为公民表达其对立法官员在响应公共需求方面的表现的看法的手段。尽管特殊利益集团可以通过直接与国会议员和工作人员直接接触来塑造和影响公共政策成果的手段,但在制定法律时,一般公众通常不会参与该过程。关于公民参与决策过程的文献存在差距,这是有问题的,因为缺乏公民的积极参与引起了关于代表合法性和代表公民制定政策的充分性的问题。这项研究通过探索古代思想家,17世纪和18世纪政治哲学家,美国宪法制定者以及当代学者和专家的理论演变,研究了公民在国会中的作用。研究问题集中于当前和最合适的公民角色,以及加强参与的步骤。与10位公民和10位国会官员的访谈产生了基于数据的公民参与理论,表明竞选筹资改革;提高公民意识;加强媒体关注;以及重新分配,投票和党派关系方面的影响的审查对于公民参与国会委员会的决策至关重要。公民,国会,私营部门以及学术界的学者和研究人员之间就该主题进行更多对话,可能会带来积极的社会变革。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, Samuel Isaiah.;

  • 作者单位

    Walden University.;

  • 授予单位 Walden University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Political Science Public Administration.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号