首页> 外文学位 >The politics of transforming financial markets and regulations: A comparison of the United States, Japan, and Germany.
【24h】

The politics of transforming financial markets and regulations: A comparison of the United States, Japan, and Germany.

机译:改变金融市场和监管的政治:美国,日本和德国的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Global financial integration does not erode politics; instead, politics still shapes financial markets. This comparative study across three industrial democracies---the United States, Japan, and Germany---reveals the extent to which domestic politics and institutions mediate the global forces of converging financial systems. The cases to be examined include reform processes in financial regulation, supervision and crisis management, stretching from the late 1970s to the early 2000s, occurring in response to the structural changes in financial markets and to the financial crises.;A small-N comparison of reform cases both across countries and over time is undertaken in this work. This thesis examines the impact of political institutions on diverse policy patterns in a variety of political contexts. In order to identify the factors that lead to policy changes, this research introduces the concept of a vested veto player. A vested veto player is a political actor who has entrenched interests in the status quo, and the potential power to veto reform initiatives. A specific focus is placed on the position or power shifts of such actors. Through in-depth comparative analysis, this study analyzes the following factors that led to these shifts: (1) the decrease in economic or political benefits associated with the status quo, (2) the increased political power of policy entrepreneurs, (3) shifts in the political alliances of veto players due to regime change, (4) Loss of public support for vested veto players, and (5) the enhanced functions of regional and global institutions that empower a national government to control or limit vetoes.;My dissertation also examines reform agenda in response to the 2007 subprime mortgage loan crisis. The discussion highlights the increasing role of regional and international institutions in financial supervision, as well as the potential political obstacles embedded in national political structures to supervisory-reform initiatives.
机译:全球金融一体化不会侵蚀政治。相反,政治仍然影响着金融市场。这项针对三个工业民主国家(美国,日本和德国)的比较研究揭示了国内政治和机构在多大程度上调解了融合金融体系的全球力量。要审查的案例包括金融监管,监督和危机管理方面的改革过程,从1970年代末到2000年代初,这是对金融市场结构变化和金融危机的回应。这项工作将进行跨国家和长期的改革案例。本文研究了政治机构在各种政治背景下对多种政策模式的影响。为了确定导致政策变更的因素,本研究引入了既得的否决权参与者的概念。既得的否决权参与者是对现状保持根深蒂固的政治演员,并具有否决改革倡议的潜在权力。具体的重点放在此类参与者的位置或权力转移上。通过深入的比较分析,本研究分析了导致这些转变的以下因素:(1)与现状相关的经济或政治利益下降,(2)政策企业家的政治权力增强,(3)转变在由于政权更迭而导致否决权参与人的政治联盟中,(4)失去了对既得的否决权参与人的公共支持,以及(5)区域和全球机构职能的增强,使中央政府有权控制或限制否决权。还研究了针对2007年次级抵押贷款危机的改革议程。讨论着重介绍了区域和国际机构在金融监管中的日益重要的作用,以及国家政治结构对监管改革举措的潜在政治障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Konoe, Sara.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.;Political Science International Law and Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 265 p.
  • 总页数 265
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号