首页> 外文学位 >Democracy, Corporate Personhood, and the American Rhetorical Imagination
【24h】

Democracy, Corporate Personhood, and the American Rhetorical Imagination

机译:民主,企业人格和美国修辞想象力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Few institutions have been more influential in shaping the (late)modern age than the limited liability corporation. Since the earliest days of the republic, the corporation's relationship to democracy and its proper role and place in the American socio-political order has been the subject of intense debate. At the center of these debates has loomed an especially unsettling question: what is the corporation and what figuration shall it take in discourse, particularly law? Since the early 19th century, the Supreme Court has answered this question by proposing that the corporation is akin to a rights and duty bearing person, and the legacy of this choice of trope---personhood---has subsequently shaped the politics surrounding the corporation's role in American society. This dissertation seeks to explain how the corporation came to be personified both in American law and public culture. Drawing on a theoretical configuration of mythic, metaphorical, and genealogical approaches to rhetorical criticism, this dissertation locates the corporation as a discursive formation with roots in the language games of the public and legal culture of American liberalism. Guided by an attitude of inquiry that seeks to discover how the discourse of the corporation has come to be naturalized in the image of personhood in a way that erodes the agency of the citizen, as well as to map how this rhetorical formulation has been resisted over time, I argue that corporate personhood, as articulated in Citizens United v. F.C.C. , has been enabled as the discourse of liberalism has undergone epistemic reconstructions that have allowed the corporation, a collective entity comprised of a multiplicity of individuals, to be recognized in law as a liberal individual. Through an analysis of an archive that includes Supreme Court rulings, legislation, public political oratory, and technocratic discourses ranging from economists to law professors, I seek to map a rhetorical genealogy of the historical contingencies and strategic discourses that enabled corporate personhood with the intent of understanding the corporation's place in American politics and culture in new ways that can expand the imaginary for democratic participation beyond the present impasse of neoliberalism.
机译:很少有机构比有限责任公司对塑造(近代)现代时代更有影响力。自共和国成立以来,公司与民主的关系及其在美国社会政治秩序中的适当作用和地位一直是激烈辩论的主题。这些辩论的中心提出了一个特别令人不安的问题:公司是什么?在讨论中,特别是在法律上,它应该采用什么形象?自19世纪初期以来,最高法院通过提出该公司类似于具有权利和义务的人的方式回答了这个问题,这种选择的隐喻-人格-的遗产随后塑造了围绕该公司的政治。公司在美国社会中的作用。本文试图解释该公司如何在美国法律和公共文化中都被人格化。本文基于对修辞批评的神话,隐喻和家谱方法的理论构架,将公司定位为一种话语形式,其根源在于公众的语言游戏和美国自由主义的法律文化。在探究态度的指导下,寻求发现公司话语如何以人格化的方式自然化,从而侵蚀公民的代理权,并勾勒出这种言辞表达如何被抵制我认为,正如《公民联合》诉FCC所述,公司具有人格由于自由主义的话语已经进行了认知的重构,使得公司成为一个由多个个人组成的集体实体,在法律上被承认为自由主义者,从而使之得以实现。通过对包括最高法院的裁决,立法,公共政治演说以及从经济学家到法学教授的技术官僚论说在内的档案进行分析,我试图绘制历史偶然性和战略话语的修辞谱系,以期使企业人格化。以新的方式了解公司在美国政治和文化中的地位,可以将民主参与的想象扩大到新自由主义目前的僵局之外。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rahko, Stephen E.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Communication.;Law.;American studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 459 p.
  • 总页数 459
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号