首页> 外文学位 >Fostering a discourse of process: A qualitative study of student perspectives on a developmental college writing course.
【24h】

Fostering a discourse of process: A qualitative study of student perspectives on a developmental college writing course.

机译:培育过程话语:定性研究学生对发展性大学写作课程的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This qualitative research study drew from phenomenological, case study, and teacher-research traditions to examine the perceptions and experiences of eight students who completed a developmental writing course. The course was designed as a research based intervention aimed at helping students learn skills, habits, and tools that could assist them with navigating college writing. The study also examined what skills and habits participants believed they needed to succeed in writing for college and how this changed throughout the course of the study. Additionally, it investigated in what ways students connected their development of these skills and habits to class activities. Finally, it examined how participants described using their knowledge about writing for classes across the curriculum.;The study was conducted at a four-year college in New York City. Data was triangulated through the use of two interviews conducted with participants after they had completed the course, assignments they wrote while enrolled in the course, and the researcher's notes. Data was analyzed in relationship to Gee's (2008) theory of Discourse and Lea and Street's (1998/2006) academic literacies model. Using these theories, the study sought to consider the connections and tensions the participants experienced between what they learned in the developmental course and what they needed when they wrote for credit-bearing college classes.;The findings suggested that participants tended to develop more of a process-oriented disposition and approach to writing as they completed the course and wrote for classes across disciplinary contexts. They drew upon a variety of the skills and strategies learned in the developmental class. There was also evidence of challenges that arose when participants encountered a variety of writing conventions and research expectations across the curriculum. Implications for future research and instructional practices are addressed.
机译:这项定性研究借鉴了现象学,案例研究和教师研究的传统,考察了八名完成发展写作课程的学生的看法和经验。本课程旨在作为一项基于研究的干预措施,旨在帮助学生学习技能,习惯和工具,以帮助他们提高大学写作水平。该研究还研究了参与者认为他们需要哪些技能和习惯才能成功撰写大学论文,以及这在整个学习过程中如何改变。此外,它还调查了学生以何种方式将他们对这些技能和习惯的发展与课堂活动联系起来。最后,它研究了参与者如何使用他们在整个课程中的写作知识来描述。该研究是在纽约市的一所四年制大学进行的。在完成课程后,通过与参与者进行的两次访谈,参加课程时编写的作业以及研究人员的笔记,对数据进行了三角测量。数据是根据与Gee(2008)的话语理论和Lea and Street(1998/2006)的学术素养模型之间的关系进行分析的。该研究使用这些理论试图考虑参与者在发展课程中所学到的内容以及他们在为获得学分的大学班级写作时所需要的知识之间的联系和张力。研究结果表明,参与者倾向于发展更多的知识。他们在完成课程并跨学科环境编写课程时,注重过程的倾向和写作方法。他们利用了在发展课堂上学到的各种技能和策略。当参与者在整个课程中遇到各种写作习惯和研究期望时,也有挑战的证据。解决了对未来研究和教学实践的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pacello, James.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Reading instruction.;Pedagogy.;Adult education.;Higher education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号