首页> 外文学位 >The Gradual Revolution: Economic Ideas, Organizational Trajectories and Policy Elites in Contemporary China (1979-2014).
【24h】

The Gradual Revolution: Economic Ideas, Organizational Trajectories and Policy Elites in Contemporary China (1979-2014).

机译:渐进式革命:当代中国的经济思想,组织轨迹和政策精英(1979-2014年)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

China's monumental policies of economic reform have transformed hundreds of millions of people's lives and forever altered the configuration of the world's political economy. However, few studies have systematically traced the origin of China's reformist policy ideas that ultimately inaugurated these changes. Existing studies either rely on the great-men-making-history explanations or deem that reform policies were mere responses to innate demands from the population or the lower level of the state bureaucracy. My research finds that the second stratum of the economic bureaucracy, consisting of ministers and bureau chiefs, steered the programmatic directions of China's ongoing economic liberalization. Consequently, this group of bureaucrats' changing backgrounds can significantly explain the changing focuses of China's economic reform in the past three decades.;Concretely speaking, I find that China's economic reform evolved through three phases, each seeing a new generation of career bureaucrats taking the helm in economic policymaking. In the first decade of reform, a generation of officials who matured as provincial leaders and generalists designed the decentralized approach to economic liberalization. They understood the economy through much closer contacts with producers on the ground than their rivals--the central technocrats--were able to establish. Beginning in the early 1990s, a second cohort composed of the "sent-down generation" with managerial experience in state-owned industrial factories began to assume the center stage and recentralized the state's capacity in rationalizing the nation's industrial structures and forging national champions. Finally, the past decade has seen the ascendance of a group of bureaucrats who share completely different career trajectories and intellectual networks from those of the industrial policymakers. The core of this macroeconomics-minded group emerged from the Comprehensive Reform School in the 1980s. Members of this School matured in State think tanks and moved into finance-related bureaucracies in a concerted fashion, pushing for the financialization of economic management of the Chinese state.;As a result, while policymakers in Latin America and East Europe during the same period of liberalization were carriers of Western economic ideas, their Chinese counterparts drew policy ideas from two mediating institutions--the "organizational state" and the "social histories" of the economic bureaucrats. Drawing inspirations from sociological studies of the state and organization theories, I define "organizational state" as a bounded bureaucratic institution where organizations are major venues of socialization for state actors and inter-organizational bid for authority in policymaking captured the major struggles in the state field. "Social histories" of economic bureaucrats refer to their career trajectories, generational characteristics, and social networks; all three ways of dissecting the social backgrounds of the policymakers converge into collective understandings of an increasingly complex economy and the role of the Chinese state in a market economy. Since policymakers' careers and visions for policy innovations molded within the space of the bureaucracy, their liberalizing policies were inevitably programs of reinventing the role of the state in economic management. I ague that this fact perpetuates the statist vision of China's economic policies against the global tide of economic neoliberalism.;In order to unpack the social and organizational history of the economic bureaucrats, this dissertation assembles an array of rarely accessed information on economic policymakers in China, including interviews of both retired and incumbent economic officials, their personal memoirs and journal articles, internal policy proposals submitted to the leadership, and the career histories of officials. I also use a mixed method approach that combines qualitative analysis of documents and interviews with sequence and network analysis to illuminate the impact of the career trajectories of economic officials.;Through delineating biographical, generational, and organizational mechanisms of policy learning and innovation, my dissertation provides an alternative explanation to the commonly acclaimed gradualist character of China's economic reform. I argue that Chinese economic reform is gradual because policymakers produced and transformed their economic ideas in a relatively autonomous state and a closed institution of elite turnover. These institutions allow the pace of social learning, generational adaptation, and organizational evolution to dictate the speed of economic liberalization. By detailing the Chinese case, this dissertation also attempts to illustrate a sociological theory of authoritarian political economy by drawing our attention to the organizational logic of elite production. Besides general societal goods and clientelist interests, I argue that historically grounded organizational identities can also serve as the major stake of state regulations. As authoritarian polities usually do not seek regularized input from the larger society, I argue that the production of state elites and their immediate institutional environment will be highly prominent in shaping how and what kinds of policies will be advanced.
机译:中国巨大的经济改革政策改变了亿万人民的生活,并永远改变了世界政治经济的格局。但是,很少有研究系统地追踪中国改革派政策思想的起源,而这些思想最终促成了这些变化。现有的研究要么依靠伟人的历史解释,要么认为改革政策仅仅是对人口的固有要求或国家官僚机构下层的回应。我的研究发现,由官僚和首长组成的经济官僚体系的第二层,引导了中国正在进行的经济自由化的计划方向。因此,这组官僚的变化背景可以极大地解释过去三十年来中国经济改革的重心。具体地说,我发现中国的经济改革经历了三个阶段,每个阶段都看到了新一代的职业官僚在经历着掌控经济决策。在改革的头十年,一代代官员以省级领导人和通才的身份成熟,他们设计了权力下放的经济自由化方法。他们通过与当地生产者建立更紧密的联系来了解经济,而他们的竞争对手是中央技术官僚。从1990年代初开始,由在国有工业工厂中具有管理经验的“下沉一代”组成的第二批人开始占据中心位置,并使国家在使国家的工业结构合理化和打造国家冠军方面的能力重新集中。最后,在过去的十年中,一群官僚的崛起与行业政策制定者们有着完全不同的职业发展轨迹和知识网络。这个具有宏观经济学思想的小组的核心来自1980年代的综合改革学院。这所学校的成员在国家智囊团中日趋成熟,并以一致的方式进入了与金融有关的官僚机构,推动了中国国家经济管理的金融化。因此,在同一时期,拉丁美洲和东欧的政策制定者自由化的国家是西方经济思想的载体,而中国的同僚则从经济官僚的“组织国家”和“社会历史”这两个中介机构汲取了政策思想。从国家和组织理论的社会学研究中汲取灵感,我将“组织国家”定义为一个有约束力的官僚机构,其中组织是国家行为者社会化的主要场所,组织间在决策中争取权威的努力抓住了国家领域的重大斗争。经济官僚的“社会历史”是指他们的职业轨迹,世代特征和社会网络。剖析政策制定者的社会背景的所有三种方式都融合为对日益复杂的经济和中国国家在市场经济中的作用的集体理解。由于决策者的职业生涯和政策创新的愿景在官僚体系中成型,他们的自由化政策不可避免地是重塑国家在经济管理中作用的计划。我可以断言,这一事实使国家对经济政策的国家主义视野永存于全球经济新自由主义浪潮中。为了揭露经济官僚的社会和组织历史,本论文汇集了一系列关于中国经济政策制定者的鲜为人知的信息包括对退休和现任经济官员的采访,他们的个人回忆录和期刊文章,提交给领导层的内部政策建议以及官员的职业经历。我还使用了一种混合方法,将文件和访谈的定性分析与顺序和网络分析相结合,以阐明经济官员的职业发展轨迹所产生的影响。;通过描述政策学习和创新的传记,世代和组织机制,我的论文提供了另一种解释,以解释中国经济改革的普遍渐进主义特征。我认为中国的经济改革是循序渐进的,因为决策者在相对自治的国家和封闭的精英流动机构中产生并转变了经济观念。这些制度使社会学习,代际适应和组织演进的步伐决定了经济自由化的速度。通过详细介绍中国案例,本论文还试图通过引起我们对精英生产的组织逻辑的关注来说明威权政治经济学的社会学理论。除了一般的社会商品和客户利益,我认为历史悠久的组织身份也可以成为国家法规的主要内容。由于专制政体通常不寻求大社会的正规投入,因此我认为,国家精英的生产及其直接的制度环境将在制定如何推进何种政策以及制定何种政策方面非常突出。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Yingyao.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Sociology.;Public policy.;Organization theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 212 p.
  • 总页数 212
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号