首页> 外文学位 >Why is there no right to employment in America? Liberal limits on American employment policy, 1933-2000.
【24h】

Why is there no right to employment in America? Liberal limits on American employment policy, 1933-2000.

机译:为什么在美国没有就业权?美国就业政策的自由限制,1933-2000年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project looks at American employment policy development between the 1930s and the 1990s and asks why government policies did not do more to ensure that there was enough employment for all would-be workers. I start with two key premises: first, that sufficient employment is essential to America's economic goals, both at a national level and at an individual level; second, that in America, paid, private employment has long been a marker of social inclusion, which makes access to stable and secure work even more important. This means that the limited scope of employment policy -- particularly the general lack of intervention to guarantee sufficient jobs -- is puzzling. I follow a case study approach, analyzing employment policy in three periods: the New Deal, the Great Society, and the Reagan Revolution. Using extensive archival material I demonstrate that America's liberal tradition has created an enduring constraint on employment policy: enshrining the responsibility to obtain work as individual rather than governmental and mandating that the government minimize its labor market intervention.;I break this liberal constraint down into two ''currents'' that pertain to employment. The first current -- work-as-citizenship -- establishes a tie between paid private employment and social citizenship, and further instructs that individuals must obtain such work for themselves. The second current -- labor-market anti-statism -- restricts federal intervention in the labor market, particularly restraining governmental efforts to create employment outside the private sector and imposing additional conditions on the employment interventions the government can take.;Between the 1930s and 1990s there were periodic challenges to the currents' boundary condition on employment policy. The elite level policy debates within the executive branch that embodied these challenges serve as my dissertation's empirical sites of investigation. These challenges, resulting from both economic and political circumstances, resulted in a variety of policy adaptations that stretched the liberal currents' limits, though the boundary condition itself remained intact. However, employment policy debates and outcomes in the 1980s-1990s also show that there is potential for work-as-citizenship to be leveraged as a basis for employment policies that ensure greater economic stability for all Americans.
机译:该项目着眼于1930年代至1990年代美国就业政策的发展,并询问为什么政府的政策没有做更多的工作来确保所有潜在的工人都有足够的就业机会。我从两个关键前提开始:首先,在国家层面和个人层面,充分就业对于美国的经济目标至关重要。第二,在美国,有偿私人就业长期以来一直是社会包容的标志,这使获得稳定和安全的工作变得更加重要。这意味着就业政策的范围有限-特​​别是普遍缺乏干预以保证足够的工作机会-令人感到困惑。我遵循一个案例研究方法,在三个阶段中分析了就业政策:新政,大社会和里根革命。我使用大量的档案材料证明,美国的自由主义传统对就业政策造成了持久的约束:赋予了以个人而非政府的身份获得工作的责任,并要求政府将对劳动力市场的干预最小化。与就业有关的“潮流”。第一个潮流是公民身份工作,在有偿私人就业和社会公民身份之间建立了联系,并进一步指示个人必须自己获得这种工作。第二种潮流-劳动力市场反国家主义-限制了联邦对劳动力市场的干预,特别是限制了政府在私营部门之外创造就业机会的努力,并对政府可以采取的就业干预措施施加了更多条件。 1990年代,当前的就业政策边界条件面临周期性挑战。行政部门内部的精英级政策辩论体现了这些挑战,是我论文研究的经验场所。尽管边界条件本身仍然完好无损,但由于经济和政治环境而产生的这些挑战导致了各种政策调整,这些政策调整扩大了自由潮流的范围。但是,1980年代至1990年代的就业政策辩论和结果也表明,有可能利用公民身份作为就业政策的基础,以确保所有美国人的经济稳定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bowring, Anais Miodek.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Cruz.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Cruz.;
  • 学科 Political science.;American history.;Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 473 p.
  • 总页数 473
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号