首页> 外文学位 >Effect of an evidence-based educational intervention on licensed nursing staff's knowledge of type 2 diabetes in a long-term care setting.
【24h】

Effect of an evidence-based educational intervention on licensed nursing staff's knowledge of type 2 diabetes in a long-term care setting.

机译:在长期护理环境中,循证教育干预对持照护理人员对2型糖尿病的了解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite being the age group with the greatest prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), older adults have often been excluded from diabetes research. The paucity of studies about T2DM in long-term care (LTC) makes it difficult to apply conclusions from studies of younger diabetics to elderly diabetics who have shorter life expectancies and impaired functional/cognitive abilities.;This DNP project was conducted at two LTC hospitals to implement T2DM clinical guidelines for elderly diabetics aged ≥ 65 years and to educate the nurses about providing care to their diabetic patients. The Iowa Model was the conceptual framework for this project, conducted in four phases: 1) baseline chart review to examine pharmacologic treatment, most recent glycosylate hemoglobin (A1c) level; A1c lab standing order, sliding scale insulin (SSI) orders, and hyper/hypoglycemic events; 2) evidence-based (EB) educational interventions for LTC T2DM management; 3) nurses' pre-test/post-test survey; and 4) chart review post intervention.;The literature review revealed that A1c and glycemic control are individualized, less stringent, and balanced with clinical and functional status; SSI is contraindicated in LTC; and ongoing EBP continuing education, nursing staff interventions, EB clinical guidelines and policies are needed in LTC.;The project's expected outcomes were: A1c improvement; no orders for SSI; appropriate hyper/hypoglycemia management; accurate, concise reporting of patients' status to providers; and increase in the nurses' confidence in managing T2DM patient care. Descriptive statistics revealed improvement in nurses' knowledge of T2DM, increased competence providing patient care, and reporting patients' health status to medical providers. There was confusion regarding appropriate A1c levels for elderly diabetics, and LTC requirements for providers to see patients. It is too early to determine if A1c values have improved. SSI continues to be ordered -- indicating a gap in providers' knowledge.;Implications: Ongoing EBP educational interventions are warranted for nurses and providers. A clinical leader/mentor is needed to support the staff as EBP is established.;Limitations: The chart reviews were paper charts, thus often illegible; fluid environment, where diabetics were discharged or died; small sample sizes, 62 nurses and 80 diabetic patients; project timeline was one-year -- inadequate to completely engage nurses to adopt practice changes.
机译:尽管是2型糖尿病(T2DM)患病率最高的年龄组,但成年人经常被排除在糖尿病研究之外。长期护理(LTC)中有关T2DM的研究很少,因此很难将年轻糖尿病患者的研究结论应用到预期寿命较短且功能/认知能力受损的老年糖尿病患者中;该DNP项目是在两家LTC医院进行的实施针对≥65岁的老年糖尿病患者的T2DM临床指南,并教育护士为糖尿病患者提供护理。爱荷华州模型是该项目的概念框架,分为四个阶段进行:1)基线图审查以检查药物治疗,最新糖基化血红蛋白(A1c)水平; A1c实验室常规命令,滑尺胰岛素(SSI)命令以及高/降血糖事件; 2)LTC T2DM管理的循证(EB)教育干预措施; 3)护士的前测/后测;文献综述显示,A1c和血糖控制是个体化的,不严格的,并且与临床和功能状态保持平衡。 LTC禁止使用SSI; LTC需要持续的EBP继续教育,护理人员干预,EB临床指南和政策。没有SSI订单;适当的高/低血糖管理;向提供者准确,简明地报告患者的状况;并提高了护士在管理T2DM患者护理方面的信心。描述性统计数据表明,护士对T2DM的了解有所改善,提供了病人护理的能力有所提高,并向医疗提供者报告了病人的健康状况。人们对老年糖尿病患者的适当A1c水平和提供者看病的LTC要求感到困惑。现在确定A1c值是否已提高还为时过早。 SSI继续受到命令,这表明提供者的知识存在差距。启示:护士和提供者必须进行持续的EBP教育干预。建立EBP时需要一名临床负责人/指导者来支持员工。局限性:图表审查是纸质图表,因此通常难以辨认;糖尿病患者出院或死亡的流体环境;样本量小,有62名护士和80名糖尿病患者;该项目的时间期限为一年-不足以使护士完全接受采用实践变更的方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gandall-Yamamoto, Pualani.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;

  • 授予单位 University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;
  • 学科 Nursing.;Gerontology.;Health care management.
  • 学位 D.N.P.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 136 p.
  • 总页数 136
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号