首页> 外文学位 >Life cycle assessment of heated airfield pavement system for snow removal.
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of heated airfield pavement system for snow removal.

机译:飞机场加热路面除雪的生命周期评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Airport operations are heavily and repeatedly impacted by snow and ice during winter seasons. Considering the potential economic losses resulting from ice/snow-related flight delays and airport shutdowns, there is a significant need to maintain the runways and taxiways free of snow and ice at all times. Traditional snow removal systems that employ de-icers and anti-icers have the potential to generate Foreign Object Debris (FOD) and could cause damage to aircraft parts and the pavements. In addition, traditional snow plows and equipment have difficulty accessing critical airside operations areas such as the apron/gate areas. An emerging technology, referred to as the heated pavement systems (HPS) are promising alternatives to traditional snow removal systems. Although heated pavement systems have been used widely in European countries for airport snow removal, there are no practical applications in US, and their environmental impacts were unknown. The purpose of this research is to evaluate and quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumptions of heated pavement systems applied in airfield in order to give decision makers a more informed view in snow removal application selections. As the very first research on environmental impacts of heated pavement systems in removing snow, this research includes three individual studies. Each one builds on the understanding of previous one.;The first study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare geothermal heated pavement system (GHPS) and traditional snow removal system applied in airport runway by evaluating their energy consumptions and GHG emissions. This study analyzes construction and operation phases of both snow removal systems. According to the limited data from previous studies, results show no significant differences between the construction phases of two snow removal systems. Also, airports show more interests in applying this new technology in airport apron area instead.;The second study is focused on energy consumption, GHG emission, and costs of operating geothermal heated pavement system, hydronic heated pavement system using electrical water heater, and hydronic heated pavement system using natural gas boiler, in removing snow from apron area. Different coefficients of performances of geothermal heated pavement system operations are analyzed in order to evaluate the behaviors of the systems. The results show geothermal heated pavement system has the least environmental impacts, and when efficiency of natural gas boiler energy extraction is improved, it can be a better alternative for place where there is not enough geothermal energy from the environmental and economic perspectives.;Based on the knowledge gained from previous two studies, the third study utilizes hybrid LCA to analyze energy consumptions and GHG emissions from apron snow removal operations. It evaluates the operations of four types of snow removal systems, hydronic heated pavement system using geothermal heat pump (HHPS-G), hydronic heated pavement system using natural gas furnace (HHPS-NG), electrically heated pavement system (EHPS), and traditional snow removal system (TSRS) applied in airport apron area. The life cycle analysis in this study is relatively more comprehensive than the previous two studies, it gives decision maker or airport manager a more informed view of operating heated pavement systems in removing snow from energy saving and global warming potential aspects.;This overall research shows heated pavement systems have potential to substitute for traditional snow removal system in decreasing energy demand and GHG emissions during apron snow removal operations. Because the theoretical models used to calculate energy consumption and GHG emissions from different types of snow removal systems are still under development, the results reported from this research should be taken into account from a qualitative view, and more comprehensive assessments which include broader system boundary are required for future study.
机译:在冬季,机场运营受到雪和冰的严重和反复影响。考虑到与冰雪相关的航班延误和机场关闭可能造成的潜在经济损失,因此迫切需要始终保持跑道和滑行道无积雪。使用除冰剂和防冰剂的传统除雪系统可能会产生异物碎片(FOD),并可能损坏飞机零件和人行道。另外,传统的扫雪机和设备难以进入关键的空侧操作区域,例如停机坪/登机口区域。称为加热路面系统(HPS)的新兴技术有望取代传统除雪系统。尽管加热的人行道系统已在欧洲国家广泛用于机场除雪,但在美国却没有实际应用,并且其对环境的影响尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是评估和量化飞机场中加热的人行道系统的温室气体排放量和能耗,以便为决策者提供更多有关除雪应用选择的见解。作为有关加热路面系统除雪对环境影响的第一项研究,该研究包括三项单独的研究。每个研究都是在对前一个理解的基础上进行的。第一项研究使用生命周期评估(LCA),通过评估其能量消耗和温室气体排放,比较了地热加热路面系统(GHPS)和机场跑道上使用的传统除雪系统。这项研究分析了两个除雪系统的建设和运营阶段。根据先前研究的有限数据,结果表明两个除雪系统的建造阶段之间没有显着差异。此外,机场对将这种新技术应用于机场停机坪区域表现出了更大的兴趣。;第二项研究的重点是能耗,温室气体排放以及运营地热加热路面系统,使用电热水器的水力加热路面系统以及水力发电的成本。使用天然气锅炉的加热路面系统,用于清除停机坪区域的积雪。分析了地热加热路面系统运行的不同性能系数,以评估系统的性能。结果表明,地热加热的路面系统对环境的影响最小,从环境和经济的角度来看,当天然气锅炉的能量提取效率提高时,它可以成为地热能量不足的更好的替代方案。根据前两次研究获得的知识,第三次研究利用混合LCA分析了停机坪除雪作业的能耗和温室气体排放。它评估了四种除雪系统,使用地热热泵的水力加热路面系统(HHPS-G),使用天然气炉的水力加热路面系统(HHPS-NG),电加热的路面系统(EHPS)和传统的除雪系统的运行情况在机场停机坪区域使用除雪系统(TSRS)。该研究中的生命周期分析比前两项研究相对全面,它为决策者或机场经理提供了从加热节能路面系统清除积雪的节能和全球变暖潜力方面的更全面信息。加热的人行道系统有可能替代传统的除雪系统,以减少围裙除雪操作中的能源需求和温室气体排放。由于用于计算不同类型除雪系统的能耗和温室气体排放的理论模型仍在开发中,因此应从定性的角度考虑该研究报告的结果,并且更广泛的评估包括更广泛的系统边界以后的学习需要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shen, Weibin.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Environmental engineering.;Civil engineering.;Transportation.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号